Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B
Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes
Volume 59, 2024 - Issue 6
21
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Optimizing herbicide selection for pre-emergence control of itchgrass and cypressvine morningglory in sugarcane

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 350-360 | Received 09 Feb 2024, Accepted 30 Apr 2024, Published online: 13 May 2024
 

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of herbicides in association to control Rottboellia exaltata and Ipomoea quamoclit during pre-emergence while also to evaluate the potential impact on the sugarcane. The experimental design employed a randomized block with seven treatments and four replications. The treatments were: 1 – no herbicide application; 2 – indaziflam + sulfentrazone; 3 – indaziflam + diclosulam; 4 – indaziflam + tebuthiuron; 5 – flumioxazin + diclosulam, 6 – flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone and 7 – clomazone + sulfentrazone. The evaluated parameters were: percentage of weeds control, green coverage percentage (Canopeo® system), weed biomass (g m−2), itchgrass height, and sugarcane tiller. Several herbicide associations have been proven effective alternatives for managing itchgrass and cypressvine morningglory. The most successful treatments for itchgrass control were indaziflam + tebuthiuron (100%) and indaziflam + diclosulam (97%), whereas for cypressvine morningglory, the betters were indaziflam + sulfentrazone (97%), indaziflam + diclosulam (98%), indaziflam + tebuthiuron (97%), flumioxazin + diclosulam (94%), and clomazone + sulfentrazone (96%). All treatments reduced the weed biomass, with indaziflam + tebuthiuron being the safest option for protecting sugarcane.

Author contributions

Conceptualization of the manuscript and development of the methodology: R.A.C., S.G.Q.C., A.P. and L.T.; data collection, analysis and interpretation: R.A.C., S.G.Q.C., S.A.Q.C., G.O.N.S. and L.T.; funding acquisition and resources: S.G.Q.C., S.A.Q.C. and A.P.; project administration: S.G.Q.C.; L.T. and P.J.C.; writing, review and editing: R.A.C., S.G.Q.C., S.A.Q.C., A.P., G.O.N.S., L.T. and P.J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, R. A. C., upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 711.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.