Examining China and Japan’s Narratives as Diplomatic Tools: Competitive Nature and International Influence

ABSTRACT

In the new millennium, China and Japan have become eager to use narratives and discourses as diplomatic tools to manage external relations and enhance their international profiles. Although these trends have prompted research into the discourses and narratives of China and Japan, previous studies have not fully explored the competitive characteristics of the two states’ ideational visions. This article aims to unravel the nature and features of ideational competition between China and Japan by focusing on representative narratives in their diplomatic strategies. It argues that China has employed narratives as diplomatic tools for practical utility through integration with material capabilities, whereas Japan has disseminated narratives as part of its comprehensive external engagements, given its declining material capabilities. The narratives of China and Japan hold significant importance in the international system. Their effective use of narratives has a crucial impact on the western-dominated international discourse system, offering new perspectives to uphold an international order and global governance.

Acknowledgments

The author appreciates the constructive feedback from the editor and two anonymous reviewers of Journal of Contemporary China.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

¹ Yung-Yung Chang, ‘The Post-Pandemic World: Between Constitutionalized and Authoritarian Orders—China’s Narrative-Power Play in the Pandemic Era’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 26(1), (2021), pp. 27–65; Lutgard Lams, ‘Examining Strategic Narratives in Chinese Official Discourse under Xi Jinping’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 23(3), (2018), pp. 387–411; Michal Mochtak and Richard Q. Turcsanyi, ‘Studying Chinese Foreign Policy Narratives: Introducing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Press Conferences Corpus’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 26(4), (2021), pp. 743–761; Nadege Rolland, ‘China’s Vision for a New World Order’, NBR Special Report #83, The National Bureau of Asian Research, January 2020; Yi Edward Yang, ‘China’s Strategic Narratives in Global Governance Reform under Xi Jinping’, Journal of Contemporary China 30(128), (2021), pp. 299–313; Yunhan Zhang and Jan Orbie, ‘Strategic Narratives in China’s Climate Policy: Analysing Three Phases in China’s Discourse Coalition’, The Pacific Review 34(1), (2021), pp. 1–28; and Kejin Zhao, ‘China’s Rise and Its Discursive Power Strategy’, Chinese Political Science Review 1, (2016), pp. 539–564.

² Rolland (n 1) and Yang (n 1).

³ Zhang and Orbie (n 1) and Zhao (n 1).

⁴ Lams (n 1).

⁵ Gustafsson, Karl, Linus Hagström, and Ulv Hanssen, ‘Long Live Pacifism! Narrative Power and Japan’s Pacifist Model’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32(4), (2019), pp. 502–520.

⁶ Linus Hagström, ‘“Power Shift” in East Asia? A Critical Reappraisal of Narratives on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Incident in 2010’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5(3), (2021), pp. 267–297; and Jingkai Shao, ‘Territorial Dispute at Home: Strategic Narratives Contestation over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Nationalization Policy in Japan’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 23(1), (2023), pp. 61–92.

⁷ Linus Hagström, ‘The Sino-Japanese Battle for Soft Power: Pitfalls and Promises’, Global Affairs 1(2), (2015), pp. 129–137; and Yida Zhai, ‘Discourse Power: Sovereignty Claims over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, Territory, Politics’, Governance 9(2), (2021), pp. 203–221.

⁸ Thomas Ameyaw-Brobbey, ‘A Critical Juncture? COVID-19 and the Fate of the US—China Struggle for Supremacy’, World Affairs 184(3), (2021), pp. 260–293; Peter Rudolf, The Sino-American World Conflict. No. 3/2020. SWP Research Paper (2020); and Wendy He Quingli and Haridas Ramasamy ‘Naming and Shaming China: America’s Strategy of Rhetorical Coercion in the South China Sea’, Contemporary Southeast Asia 42(3), (2020), pp. 317–345.

⁹ H. D. P. Envall and Thomas S. Wilkins, ‘Japan and the New Indo-Pacific Order: The Rise of an Entrepreneurial Power’, The Pacific Review 36(4), (2023), pp.691–722; Kai He, ‘Role Conceptions, Order Transition and Institutional Balancing in the Asia-Pacific: A New Theoretical Framework’, Australian Journal of International Affairs 72(2), (2018), pp. 92–109; and Stephanie Christine Winkler, ‘“Soft Power Is such a Benign Animal”: Narrative Power and the Reification of Concepts in Japan’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32(4), (2019), pp. 483–501.

¹⁰ Yang (n 1).

¹¹ Devendra Kumar Bishnoi, ‘The Community of Shared Futures: China’s Counter to Indo-Pacific Narratives’, in China and the Indo-Pacific: Maneuvers and Manifestations, eds. Swaran Singh and Reena Marwah (Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2003), p. 146.

¹² Lawrence Freedman, The Transformation of Strategic Affairs, The Adelphi Papers 45(379), (2006), p. 22.

¹³ Alister Miskimmon, Ben O’Loughlin, and Laura Roselle, Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order (New York: Routledge, 2013), p. 2.

¹⁴ Linus Hagström and Karl Gustafsson, ‘Narrative Power: How Storytelling Shapes East Asian International Politics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32(4), (2019), pp. 387–406.

¹⁵ Rolland (n 1) and Yang (n 1).

¹⁶ Maarten A. Hajer, ‘Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain’, in The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, eds. Frank Fischer and John Forester (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993), p. 45.

¹⁷ Miskimmon, O’Loughlin, and Roselle (n 13), p. 7.

¹⁸ Jinghan Zeng, Slogan Politics: Understanding Chinese Foreign Policy Concepts (Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020), p. 2.

¹⁹ Des Gasper and Raymond Apthorpe, ‘Introduction: Discourse Analysis and Policy Discourse’, in Arguing Development Policy—Frames and Discourses, eds. Raymond Apthorpe and Des Gasper (London: Frank Cass, 1996), p. 4.

²⁰ Aurelio Insisa, ‘China’s Discourse on Strategic Communications: Insights into PRC External Propaganda’, Defence Strategic Communications 10(10), (2021), pp. 111–152.

²¹ Miskimmon, O’Loughlin, and Roselle (n 13), p. 2.

²² Craig Parsons, ‘Ideas and Power: Four Intersections and How to Show them’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(3), (2016), pp. 446–463.

²³ Rolland (n 1), p. 11.

²⁴ Alexander Bukh, ‘Revisiting Japan’s Cultural Diplomacy: A Critique of the Agent-Level Approach to Japan’s Soft Power’, Asian Perspective 38(3), (2014), pp. 461–485.

²⁵ David Campbell, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992), p. 172.

²⁶ Fu Ying, ‘Shape Global Narratives for Telling China’s Stories’, China Daily, April 21, 2020, accessed March 10, 2023, https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202004/21/WS5e9e313ba3105d50a3d178ab.html.

²⁷ Hidetaka Yoshimatsu, Japan’s Asian Diplomacy: Power Transition, Domestic Politics, and Diffusion of Ideas (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020), p. 39.

²⁸ Envall and Wilkins (n 9), p. 702.

²⁹ Alexander Semenov and Anatoly Tsvyk, ‘The Approach to the Chinese Diplomatic Discourse’, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14(4), (2021), p. 573.

³⁰ Rolland (n 1), p. 36.

³¹ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, ‘The Central Conference on Work Relating to Foreign Affairs was Held in Beijing’, November 29, 2014, accessed May 13, 2020,　https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjb_663304/zzjg_663340/xws_665282/xgxw_665284/201412/t20141201_600270.html.

³² Jacob Mardell, ‘The “Community of Common Destiny” in Xi Jinping’s New Era’, The Diplomat, October 25, 2017, accessed March 13, 2023, https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/the-community-of-common-destiny-in-xi-jinpings-new-era/.

³³ Denghua Zhang, ‘The Concept of “Community of Common Destiny” in China’s Diplomacy: Meaning, Motives and Implications’, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 5(2), (2018), p. 198.

³⁴ Lingliang Zeng, Contemporary International Law and China’s Peaceful Development (Singapore: Springer, 2021), p. 322.

³⁵ Zhang (n 33), p. 198 and Zeng (n 18), p. 126.

³⁶ World Economic Forum, ‘President Xi’s Speech to Davos in Full’, January 17, 2017, accessed April 17, 2023, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/full-text-of-xi-jinping-keynote-at-the-world-economic-forum.

³⁷ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, ‘Xi Jinping Attends General Debate of 70th Session of the UN General Assembly and Delivers Important Speech’, September 29, 2015, accessed April 17, 2023, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/topics_665678/2015zt/xjpdmgjxgsfwbcxlhgcl70znxlfh/201510/t20151008_705395.html.

³⁸ Qingmin Zhang, ‘The 20th CPC National Congress and China’s Foreign Policy: Implication and Reflection’, China International Strategy Review 5(1), (2023), pp. 1–23.

³⁹ Zeng (n 18), pp. 120–124.

⁴⁰ Zhang (n 33).

⁴¹ Cultural Exchange Organization of Presenting China to the World, ‘Xi Jinping Addresses a Symposium Marking the Fifth Anniversary of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)’, August 28, 2018, accessed April 23, 2023, http://en.chinaapw.com/news_detail.php?id=336.

⁴² International Labour Organization, ‘Promoting an Open, Invigorated and Inclusive World Economy, September 12, 2017’, accessed April 12, 2023, https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_574181/lang–en/index.htm.

⁴³ Shin Kawashima, ‘Xi Jinping’s Diplomatic Philosophy and Vision for International Order: Continuity and Change from the Hu Jintao Era’, Asia-Pacific Review 26(1), (2019), p. 139.

⁴⁴ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’, April 2023, accessed June 10, 2023, https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000430632.pdf.

⁴⁵ Aurelio Insisa and Giulio Pugliese. ‘The Free and Open Indo-Pacific Versus the Belt and Road: Spheres of Influence and Sino-Japanese Relations’, The Pacific Review 35(3), (2022), pp. 557–585.

⁴⁶ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (n 44).

⁴⁷ Kei Koga, ‘Japan’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision under Suga: Transition and Future Challenges in Southeast Asia’, East Asian Policy 13(3), (2021), pp. 88–89; and Yoshikatsu Suzuki, Nihon no Senryaku Gaiko [Japan’s Strategic Diplomacy] (Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo, 2017).

⁴⁸ Teruaki Aizawa, ‘Indo-Taiheiyo ni Okeru Kaiyo Gabanansu: FOIP no Shiten kara [Maritime governance in the Indo-Pacific: From the perspective of FOIP]’, Kaiyo Anzen Hosho Joho Tokuho, April 13, 2022, accessed June 4, 2023, https://www.spf.org/oceans/global-data/commentary-20220413.pdf.

⁴⁹ Matake Kamiya, ‘Kyoso Senryaku no Tame no Kyoryoku Senryaku [Cooperation strategy for competitive strategy]’, Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies, February 2019, accessed May 15, 2022, http://ssdpaki.la.coocan.jp/proposals/26.html.

⁵⁰ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ‘New Plan for a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP)”, March 2023’, accessed May 13, 2023, https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100484990.pdf.

⁵¹ Kozo Kato, The Web of Power: Japanese and German Development Cooperation Policy (Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 2002).

⁵² Yoshimatsu (n 27), p. 193.

⁵³ Kenki Adachi, ‘Dai niji Abe Seiken ki ni Naze `Ningen no Anzen Hosho’ e no Genkyu ga Zoka shita no ka? [Why did references to ‘human security’ increase during the second Abe administration?]’, Ritsumeikan Kokusai Kenkyu 35(2), (2022), pp.183–200.

⁵⁴ Yutaro Yamamoto, ‘Jiyude Hirakareta Indotaiheiyo Tanjo Hiwa [An untold story of the birth of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific]’, June 30, 2021, accessed March 10, 2023, https://www.nhk.or.jp/politics/articles/feature/62725.html.

⁵⁵ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2017-nenban Kaihatsu Kyoryoku Hakusho: Nihon no Kokusai Kyoryoku [2017 White Paper on Development Cooperation: Japan’s International Cooperation] accessed March 16, 2023, https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/press/shiryo/page22_000825.html.

⁵⁶ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Reiwa 2-nenban Gaiko Seisho [Diplomatic Blue Paper 2020], accessed March 16, 2023, https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/bluebook/2020/html/chapter3_02_01.html.

⁵⁷ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (n 49).

⁵⁸ Devendra Kumar Bishnoi (n 11), p. 148.

⁵⁹ Yang (n 1) and Zhang (n 33), p. 199.

⁶⁰ Suisheng Zhao, ‘Rethinking the Chinese World Order: The Imperial Cycle and the Rise of China’, Journal of Contemporary China 24(96), (2015), pp. 961–982.

⁶¹ Joshua Eisenman, ‘Locating Africa in China’s Community of Shared Future for Mankind: A Relational Approach’, Journal of International Development 35(1), (2023), pp. 65–78; and Maria Rudyak, ‘“We Help Them, and They Help Us”: Reciprocity and Relationality in Chinese Aid to Africa’, Journal of International Development 35(4), (2023), pp. 583–599.

⁶² Xu Jin and Guo Chu, ‘Mingyun Gongtongti gainian Bianxi [Analysis of Community with a Shared Future for Mankind Concept]’, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of World Economics and Politics, 1–14, cited in Rolland (n 1), p. 42.

⁶³ Wilson Center, ‘Xi’s Statements on Education’, accessed May 22, 2023, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/xis-statements-education.

⁶⁴ Naoko Eto, ‘Japan-China Strategic Communications Dynamics under the Belt and Road Initiative: The Case of ‘Third Country Business Cooperation’, Asian Perspective 45(3), (2021), p. 541.

⁶⁵ H. D. P. Envall, ‘The Pacific Islands in Japan’s “Free and Open Indo-Pacific”’, Security Challenges 16(1), (2020), pp. 65–77; Koga (n 46); and Tomohiko Satake, ‘Japan’s “Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy” and its Implication for ASEAN’, Southeast Asian Affairs 19(1), (2019), pp. 69–82.

⁶⁶ Envall and Wilkins (n 9).

⁶⁷ Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, ‘Infura Shisutemu Kaigai Tenkai Kodo Keikaku 2023 [Transport and Tourism, Action Plan for Overseas Deployment of Infrastructure Systems, 2023]’, accessed November 12, 2023, https://www.mlit.go.jp/report/press/content/001613818.pdf.

⁶⁸ Stephen R. Nagy, ‘Sino-Japanese Relations: Drivers and Obstacles in the Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision’, in China and the Indo-Pacific: Maneuvers and Manifestations, eds Swaran Singh and Reena Marwah (Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2003), p. 64.

⁶⁹ Xi Jinping, ‘Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era’, October 18, 2017, accessed December 13, 2022, https://www.neac.gov.cn/seac/c103372/202201/1156519.shtml.

⁷⁰ Li Keqiang, ‘Zhengfu Gongzuo Baogao [Government Work Report]’, March 5, 2018, accessed December 13, 2022, http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018lh/2018–03/22/c_1122575588.htm.

⁷¹ Zhang (n 33), p. 199.

⁷² Mardell (n 32).

⁷³ Xin Zhou, ‘China Focus: China Pursues World Peace, Common Development in International Agenda’, March 2, 2018, accessed May 19, 2022, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018–03/02/c_137011860.htm.

⁷⁴ Xi Jinping, ‘BRICS Countries Need to Act with a Sense of Responsibility and Bring Positive, Stabilizing and Constructive Strength to the World’, June 23, 2022, accessed May 16, 2023, http://brics2022.mfa.gov.cn/eng/dtxw/202206/t20220623_10708943.html#:~:text=We%20need%20to%20encourage%20the,unilateral%20sanctions%20and%20abuse%20of.

⁷⁵ Raoul Bunskoek and Chih-yu Shih, ‘“Community of Common Destiny” as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective’, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18(70), (2021), p. 87.

⁷⁶ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, ‘Dakar Declaration of the Eighth Ministerial Conference of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation’, December 22, 2021, accessed March 13, 2023, http://www.focac.org/focacdakar/eng/hyqk_1/202112/t20211222_10474202.htm.

⁷⁷ News Central Asia, ‘Xi’an Declaration of the China-Central Asia Summit’, May 20, 2023, accessed August 29, 2023, https://www.newscentralasia.net/2023/05/20/xian-declaration-of-the-china-central-asia-summit/.

⁷⁸ Glenn D. Hook, et al., Japan’s International Relations: Politics, Economics and Security. 3rd edn. (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2011); and Takashi Inoguchi and Purnendra Jain, ‘Introduction: Beyond Karaoke Diplomacy?’ in Japanese Foreign Policy Toda, eds. Takashi Inoguchi and Purnendra Jain (New York: Palgrave, 2000), pp. xi-xix.

⁷⁹ Jeffrey W. Hornung, ‘Abe Shinzo’s Lasting Impact: Proactive Contributions to Japan’s Security and Foreign Policies’, Asia-Pacific Review 28(1), (2021), p. 39.

⁸⁰ Adam P. Liff and Phillip Y. Lipscy. ‘Japan Transformed? The Foreign Policy Legacy of the Abe Government’, The Journal of Japanese Studies 48(1), (2022), pp. 123–147.

⁸¹ Yamamoto (n 54).

⁸² Hornung (n 79), p. 39.

⁸³ The State Council Information Office, ‘Full text of Xi Jinping’s keynote address at the CPC in Dialogue with World Political Parties High-level Meeting’, March 16, 2023, accessed March 10, 2023, http://english.scio.gov.cn/topnews/2023–03/16/content_85171478.htm.

⁸⁴ Hotaka Machida, ‘Chugoku no “Jinrui Unmei Kyodotai” Koso ni Do Mukiauka [How to deal with China’s “Community of Shared Future for Mankind” concept]’, Chikeigaku Burifingu 157, accessed November 19, 2023, https://apinitiative.org/2023/05/29/46366/.

⁸⁵ Fumio Kishida, ‘Japan’s PM Fumio Kishida Writes: Japan and India Renewing a Pledge’, The Indian Press, March 20, 2023. accessed May 16, 2023, https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/japans-pm-fumio-kishida-writes-japan-and-india-renewing-a-pledge-8505703/.

⁸⁶ Amitav Acharya, ‘Can Asia Lead? Power Ambitions and Global Governance in the Twenty-First Century’, International Affairs 87(4), (2011), p. 852.