62
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Self-management eHealth solutions for menopause – a systematic scoping review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 255-268 | Received 18 Oct 2023, Accepted 18 Mar 2024, Published online: 29 Apr 2024

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this scoping review was to highlight the current scientific evidence on eHealth-based information tools for menopause in terms of quality, requirements and previous intervention outcomes.

Methods

We systematically searched electronic databases (Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Global Health Database [Ovid], Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov [NLM], LIVIVO Search Portal [ZB MED] and Google Scholar) from 1974 to March 2022 for relevant records.

Results

Our search yielded 1773 records, of which 28 met our inclusion criteria. Thirteen of 28 selected studies were cross-sectional with qualitative content analysis of websites about menopause; 9 studies were cohort studies examining the impact of an eHealth intervention; two studies were randomized controlled trials comparing eHealth tools with conventional ones; and four studies were non-systematic literature reviews.

Conclusion

This scoping review highlights the potential of eHealth-based information tools for the management of menopause and shows that most eHealth-based information tools are inadequate in terms of readability and the balanced view on information. Providers of eHealth-based information tools should pay attention to a participatory design, readability, balance of content and the use of multimedia tools for information delivery to improve understanding.

摘要

目的: 本范围综述的目的是, 从质量、要求和以往的干预结果等方面, 强调目前有关基于电子健康的绝经期信息工具的科学证据。

方法: 我们系统地检索了1974 年至2022年3月期间的电子数据库(Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、全球健康数据库[Ovid]、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov [NLM]、LIVIVO Search Portal [ZB MED] 和 Google Scholar), 以查找相关记录。

结果: 我们共搜索到1773条记录, 其中28条符合我们的纳入标准。纳入的28项研究中有13项是对绝经网站进行定性内容分析的横断面研究;9项是研究电子健康干预措施影响的队列研究;2项是比较电子健康工具与传统工具的随机对照试验;4项是非系统性文献综述。

结论: 本范围综述强调了基于电子健康的信息工具在更年期管理方面的潜力, 并表明大多数基于电子健康的信息工具在可读性和信息平衡方面存在不足。电子健康信息工具的提供者应注意参与式设计、可读性、内容平衡以及采用多媒体工具提供信息, 以提高对信息的理解。

Introduction

Rationale

Climacteric symptoms include vasomotor symptoms, urogenital symptoms, insomnia, mood swings, problems with concentration and memory (especially short-term memory), irritability, loss of sexual desire, and muscle and joint discomfort [Citation1]. These symptoms can cause physical discomfort and emotional distress [Citation2]. The prevalence of symptomatic climacteric women is around 40% (ranging from 13% to 62%) [Citation3–5]. Moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms can thus have a negative impact on the quality of life, performance at work and daily activities [Citation6]. Providing information can improve health literacy and consequently have an impact on decision-making, self-management [Citation7] and quality of life for affected women [Citation8–12]. The current situation shows that the majority of menopausal women report concerns about their own management of menopause, describing themselves as not sufficiently informed [Citation13] and reporting feelings of isolation on their ‘menopause journey’ [Citation14]. A notable proportion of menopausal women surveyed report that their physician is not their primary source of information regarding menopause [Citation15–19]. In contrast, knowledge and training gaps exist among physicians regarding menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), further constraining the prescription of menopausal hormone therapies [Citation20]. In recent years, the Internet has become an important source of information on menopausal complaints [Citation21]. Many menopausal women regard the Internet as an important source of information [Citation22–26]. Digital health information tools can contribute to a well-informed patient and promote self-management in health care, especially for stigmatized health issues such as menopause [Citation27]. Despite the abundance of information available on the Internet, the need for easily accessible, truthful information about menopause is considerable both for patients and for the medical profession [Citation28,Citation29].

Objective

With this practice-oriented scoping review, we aim to summarize existing literature and scientific evidence on eHealth-based information tools for the self-management of menopause.

Methods

Protocol and registration

The study protocol was registered prospectively with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/5rcdq) on 24 March 2022 in accordance with the reporting guidance provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-S) statements [Citation30] (Supplementary data Additional file 1).

Eligibility criteria

Articles included in this scoping review needed to be in English, German, Spanish or French. Additionally, they needed to be full-length, peer-reviewed and include research on a broad range of different menopausal eHealth solutions (e.g. web portals, mobile applications, video consultations). Duplicates and studies based on non-digital educational approaches for self-management of menopause were excluded.

Information sources

Systematic literature searches for the following information sources were developed and executed by a professional librarian (H.J.) to identify all potentially relevant documents on the topic: Ovid MEDLINE ALL (1946–15 March 2022), Embase (1974–15 March 2022), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) (1937–15 March 2022), Cochrane Library (Wiley) (1996–15 March 2022), Global Health Database (Ovid) (1973–11 March 2022), Web of Science (all editions) (1900–15 March 2022), ClinicalTrials.gov (NLM), LIVIVO Search Portal (ZB MED) and Google Scholar.

Search strategy

Candidate search terms were identified by looking at subject headings, titles, abstracts and author keywords from a list of core references. A draft search strategy was developed using those terms and additional relevant vocabulary from different database thesauri. Search terms were also identified using the Yale MeSH Analyzer and the PubReMiner word frequency analysis tool. The initial search strategy in MEDLINE (Ovid) was tested against this list of core references to see whether they were included in the search results. After refinement and consultations with the review team, search strategies were set up for each information source based on database-specific controlled vocabulary (subject headings) and text words. Synonyms and similar terms were included in the text word search. Animal studies were formally excluded from the search results. No limits concerning study types, languages, publication years or other criteria were applied in the database searches. The final database searches were run on 16 March 2022, in the databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Global Health and Web of Science, and in the international trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov. Searches were also conducted on the LIVIVO Search Portal and Google Scholar. The main search concepts used in accordance with the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria were ‘patient portals’/’e-health’/’self-management’ and ‘menopause’. A total of 2941 citations were retrieved from those searches. The full database search strategies are presented in the Supplemental data. In addition to electronic database searches, reference lists of included articles were manually screened to identify additional studies. Duplicate references were removed by H.J., first using EndNote’s duplicate identification strategy and then manually. After deduplication, 1774 references remained.

Selection of sources of evidence

The authors (S.V., P.S.) used the program covidence.org to deduplicate articles and track progress on the screening and full-text review process. After deduplication, two reviewers (S.V., P.S.), working in pairs, screened article titles and abstracts. The reviewers (S.V., P.S.) discussed discrepancies in the abstract screening and reached consensus through discussion. The same two reviewers (S.V., P.S.) conducted the full-text review.

Data charting process

The reviewers developed a data-extraction form in Microsoft Excel. For all articles, one author performed the extractions (S.V.), which were then verified for accuracy (P.S.). Data extracted were charted based on the publication year, author, journal, study design, participants’ characteristics, intervention, outcome measures and results.

Quality assessment

A.K. and S.T. independently assessed the risk of bias in each study using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) study quality assessment tool [Citation31]. For any disagreement, a third rater (S.S.) was contacted for clarification.

Results

The PRISMA flow diagram () shows the flow of records. Of the 1733 records screened, 110 proceeded to full-text review; from these, a total of 28 articles met the criteria for inclusion and were included in this scoping review [Citation32–59]. Most of the excluded articles did not include data specific to the issue ‘eHealth solutions for menopause’ (n = 81).

Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA) flow diagram: literature search and retrieval process. Adapted from: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. [doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71]

Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA) flow diagram: literature search and retrieval process. Adapted from: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. [doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71]

Characteristics of sources of evidence

Thirteen out of 28 selected studies (46.4%) were cross-sectional studies with qualitative content analysis of websites about menopause [Citation32,Citation33,Citation35–38,Citation42,Citation44,Citation46–48,Citation51,Citation55]. Nine out of 28 selected studies (32.1%) were cohort studies in which the impact of eHealth technologies in menopausal women was examined toward different endpoints (e.g. knowledge, shared decision-making, doctor–patient relationship, acceptance, online search behavior, symptom tracking) [Citation39–41,Citation43,Citation45,Citation50,Citation52,Citation54,Citation60], and two out of 28 selected studies (7.1%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare eHealth tools with conventional care (e.g. decision support tool, web-based information tool) [Citation34,Citation49]. The remaining four out of 28 selected studies (14.2%) were non-systematic literature reviews [Citation56,Citation57,Citation59,Citation61].

In the cross-sectional studies with qualitative content analysis of menopause websites and applications (13 out of 28 studies), the sample size varied from eight [Citation36] up to 100 [Citation55] websites analyzed. In the cohort studies where the impact of eHealth technologies in perimenopausal women was examined (9 out of 28 selected studies), the sample size varied from 15 [Citation50] to 492 study participants [Citation40]. Only two of these 9 cohort studies reported a study population greater than 30 participants [Citation40,Citation45]. Sample sizes were highest among RCTs examining the effect of web-based eHealth tools in perimenopausal women (two out of 28 studies), with 232 [Citation39] up to 409 [Citation49] study participants. The participants’ ages ranged from 30 to 73 years in the cohort studies and from 45 to 75 years in the RCTs. Out of the selected studies, a total of three were conducted on e-Health and menopause in 2021 (n = 3, 10.3%) [Citation41,Citation45,Citation46]. The remaining studies were distributed between 2002 and 2020 (n = 26, 89.7%).

Quality assessment

Regarding the risk of bias, most of the cross-sectional non-interventional studies were rated as fair (12/14; 85%), all RCT studies were rated as good and all interventional non-randomized cohort studies were rated as poor (see Supplementary data Tables 4–6).

Synthesis of results

Our literature review is based primarily on intervention outcomes (patient satisfaction, decision-making, health literacy) and content analysis (timeliness, authorship, balance of information) of different eHealth tools for menopausal management such as websites, web portals, podcasts, mobile applications and video consultations.

Interventional studies on web-based eHealth tools

Among the interventional studies, there were two RCTs [Citation34,Citation49] () and nine cohort studies [Citation39–41,Citation43,Citation45,Citation50,Citation52–54] (). Saver et al. conducted an RCT shortly after the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial to investigate the effect of web-based decision support tools on 409 perimenopausal women [Citation49]. It showed greater decisional satisfaction and significantly higher knowledge scores in patients who received web-based decision support [Citation18]. Women who received the web-based solution showed a higher dropout rate compared to those who received a brochure, indicating that web-based decision support is suitable for patients with high intrinsic motivation who want to participate in decision-making [Citation49]. Similar results were obtained in another RCT, where a different web-based decision tool (TalkToYourDoc) was compared to usual care in perimenopausal women (n = 288) [Citation34]. Health-care providers (HCPs) (n = 26) were surveyed for complementary purposes. HCPs reported an increased visit efficiency in the intervention group and said that those participants were more engaged in the discussion, asked more relevant questions about MHT and thus empowered themselves to participate in discussions regarding MHT. Another cohort study compared a web-based decision support tool (WISDOM) with standard health care in perimenopausal women (n = 232) and demonstrated a beneficial effect on patients and physicians through a web-based decision support tool. Patients in the intervention group stated that they had received the ‘right amount’ of information, feeling adequately informed and more confident in knowing their own risks. Additionally, WISDOM users were more likely to exercise and adapt their diets compared to controls, whereas stronger effects were observed among less educated women [Citation39]. Cumming et al. examined the impact on self-awareness and self-empowerment that an online digital storytelling tool on urogenital atrophy had on 492 perimenopausal women [Citation40]. Of the women who had been too embarrassed to discuss their symptoms with their doctor, 73% stated that they now would do so, 87% said they would make an appointment to discuss their urogenital atrophy and 96% stated that they would be willing to try a treatment [Citation40]. A smaller cohort study investigated the use of online information among perimenopausal women (n = 32) and physicians (n = 10) [Citation43]. None of the women interviewed had received a recommendation for informative websites from physicians, and physicians respectively confirmed that they had not, so far, encouraged patients to look up information on the Internet. Similarly, a pilot study with a web-based online menopause education program (‘Chart the change’) with 35 perimenopausal women showed significantly higher knowledge about menopause after the intervention. The women further expressed that the information available in the online program was inviting, easy to understand and informative [Citation52].

Table 1. Randomized controlled interventional studies on eHealth solutions for menopause.

Table 2. Interventional cohort studies on eHealth solutions for menopause.

Another cohort study reflected perimenopausal women’s optimistic perspective on web-based information for menopause. Respondents said that they felt empowered in decision-making and felt able to engage in a discussion with their physician about treatment options for their menopausal symptoms. Websites that included personalized stories from peers or sensitivity to patient perspectives (e.g. frequently asked questions) improved their perception of trust [Citation50].

Interventional studies on other digital tools

Two main themes were identified in a study analyzing the impact of a menopause podcast among perimenopausal women (): journey of knowledge gain and reframing menopause. The sharing of peer experiences in the podcast gave them a sense of belonging, motivated them to make behavioral adjustments and encouraged them to discuss this issue with their HCP and exchange information with other affected women, thus helping to reduce the stigma associated with menopause [Citation41].

Qualitative assessment studies on web-based and mobile-based eHealth tools

A total of 13 cross-sectional studies with qualitative assessment of eHealth tools on menopause conducted from 2002 until 2021 were found [Citation32,Citation33,Citation35–38,Citation42,Citation44,Citation46–48,Citation51,Citation55] (). Murtaza et al. found in their qualitative analysis of popular Canadian menopause websites (n = 92) that most lacked medical content and were commercially oriented (n = 70, 76%), with only half providing information on MHT consistent with current research and just one website offering the public-recommended reading level [Citation46]. Non-profit websites (n = 15, 16.3%) were characterized by a significantly higher quality of medical content score (16.2 ± 3.2; p < 0.001) compared to commercial (6.5 ± 0.5) or governmental (13.1 ± 3.7) websites. Murtaza et al. further show that the popularity of a website based on Google ranking did not correlate with the quality of medical information. For example, the consumer-oriented webpage from the Canadian Women’s Health Network with the most balanced and complete information (quality score = 12; popularity link index = 7) was less popular compared to the website of the North American Menopause Society (NAMS) (quality score = 8; popularity index = 517) [Citation47]. In a more recent study by Yuksel et al. [Citation55], the quality of commercial websites for bioidentical hormone therapy (BHT; n = 100) was obtained by the DISCERN (Discerning the Quality of Written Consumer Health Information) instrument. The DISCERN instrument is a tool for evaluating the quality of health information especially regarding treatment options [Citation62]. In the cross-sectional qualitative assessment study of commercial websites for bioidentical hormone therapy by Yuksel et al., a low DISCERN score (mean score 15.4 ± 4.87) was obtained combined with a deficient balance of information. Claims made about BHT on the Internet were misleading and not consistent with the recommendations of current professional organizations [Citation55]. Another study by Sowter et al. analyzed the quality, information coverage and readability of 39 information websites on herbal remedies for the relief of menopausal symptoms [Citation51]. The authors observed that most websites, mainly commercial, offered poor, low-quality information at a high reading level, with a positive correlation between information quality and coverage scores irrespective of the website provider (p < 0.001) and with commercial sites scoring significantly lower in quality than non-commercial ones (p = 0.014) [Citation51].

Table 3. Cross-sectional studies with qualitative assessment on eHealth solutions for menopause.

Aleksova et al. conducted a content and quality analysis of 26 early menopause websites, revealing that few disclosed authorship (39%) or provided references (54%), and only 35% were quality certified [Citation32]. Most of these sites (54%) had readability levels above the recommended, making them difficult to read. Notably, medical society websites were not top ranking in search results, likely due to a lack of search engine optimization. Kenen et al. conducted a further content analysis within the online community forum FORCE (Facing our Risk of Cancer Empowered), focused on MHT in BRCA mutation carriers, that emphasized the value of such communities [Citation44]. Unlike medical websites, this platform facilitates emotional support and helps counter feelings of isolation among members. The continuous exchange among affected individuals fosters a collective wisdom and expertise, crucial for decision-making support in medically uncertain situations [Citation44]. The other studies that were included and concerned qualitative assessment of menopause websites showed similar results, generally with a lack of balance in the information presented, difficulty in finding risk information, lack of bibliographic citations, lack of timeliness, lack of distinction between patient-oriented versus professional information and misleading information (e.g. MHT for cycle regulation, femininity promotion) [Citation35–38,Citation48]. Gkrozou et al. conducted a qualitative content analysis of 22 menopause mobile apps [Citation42]. Only a minority of the apps studied involved medical professionals (27.3%), offered evidence-based information (22.7%) or contained video material as an educational tool (22.7%).

Discussion

This scoping review highlights the current scientific evidence on eHealth-based information tools for menopause in terms of quality, requirements and intervention outcomes. According to the literature and the Health Belief Model [Citation63], a well-informed patient is more likely to participate in health-care decisions, to show adherence and to engage in preventative treatment behaviors, which all result in better outcomes in medicine [Citation41,Citation64–66]. A small body of research has found that general health information presented using multimedia-based technology and involving an interactive approach (e.g. verbally or visually) increases health knowledge and understanding of the medical information presented [Citation67] and therefore has a positive impact on health management, including the uptake of preventive behaviors [Citation41]. The user-friendliness of eHealth resources is a prerequisite for tapping into the aforementioned potential on self-management of health issues and can help to convey a sense of self-efficiency.

Existing assessments of menopause eHealth solutions in this scoping review show that websites are often commercial in origin and that the quality tends to be lower on commercial websites compared to non-commercial websites [Citation36,Citation37,Citation47,Citation51]. Besides poor quality, most menopause websites and applications feature a readability level that is too high, as they exceed the recommended sixth-grade reading level. An overly high readability level is also frequently mentioned in health web portals on other specialties [Citation57]. A considerable proportion of the studies involved in this scoping review criticized the lack of timeliness, declaration of authorship and scientific references on menopausal websites [Citation47,Citation48]. Another topic of criticism was the discrepancy between information on websites and current recommendations of menopause professionals, societies and guidelines [Citation55]. This discrepancy could further promote confusion among women affected by menopause who are seeking help [Citation55]. According to a systematic literature review on the quality of medical websites, deficiencies in content are a frequently encountered problem [Citation68]. Our scoping review reveals a high reading level in eHealth resources for menopause [Citation42], which makes them difficult to read and which can be a barrier associated with a lack of use or a delay in the uptake of these resources for self-management in menopause.

To further elaborate, while the majority of studies included in this systematic scoping review were published prior to 2021, with only three considered more recent [Citation41,Citation45,Citation46], it is essential to acknowledge the need for additional literature in this field. This scarcity of recent studies underlines a significant gap in current research, emphasizing the importance of ongoing and future studies to provide a more comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of the quality and effectiveness of eHealth information for menopause.

To conclude, eHealth technologies should be designed in an audience-friendly manner. Based on the literature research throughout this scoping review, providers of eHealth information should be mindful of the following considerations: readability; simplicity in design; balance of content; and use of multimedia for information delivery to improve comprehension (infotainment) [Citation57,Citation69]. In order to do justice to all of the aforementioned factors, patients, doctors, other therapists, product suppliers (e.g. the pharmaceutical industry) and eHealth providers should all be engaged in the design of eHealth products as early as possible (co-design) [Citation70]. This multi-stakeholder approach allows eHealth tools to appeal to a broad audience [Citation71].

Conclusion

This scoping review highlights the potential of user-friendly eHealth resources in the self-management of menopause. Until now, most web-based information tools on menopause have been deficient in terms of content quality, readability, timeliness, authorship and balance of information. The effectiveness of digital health services for women with menopausal symptoms should be further supported with scientific evidence regarding health literacy, reduction of menopausal symptoms and cost-effectiveness [Citation58].

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (49.6 KB)

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for Besins Healthcare Germany GmbH initiating a mentoring program for gynecological endocrinology. In this context, the idea for this scoping review was developed. P. Stute was a mentor and S. Vollrath, S. Theis and A. Kolokythas were mentees.

Disclosure statement

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article. Since this systematic review does not include any pharmacological treatments, the authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Funding

Nil.

Unknown widget #5d0ef076-e0a7-421c-8315-2b007028953f

of type scholix-links

References

  • Maki PM, Wu M, Rubin LH, et al. Hot flashes are associated with altered brain function during a memory task. Menopause. 2020;27(3):269–277. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001467.
  • NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on management of menopause-related symptoms. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2005;22(1):1–38.
  • Chung H-F, Pandeya N, Dobson AJ, et al. The role of sleep difficulties in the vasomotor menopausal symptoms and depressed mood relationships: an international pooled analysis of eight studies in the InterLACE consortium. Psychol Med. 2018;48(15):2550–2561. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000168.
  • Blümel JE, Arteaga E, Parra J, et al. Decision-making for the treatment of climacteric symptoms using the Menopause Rating Scale. Maturitas. 2018;111:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.02.010.
  • Petra Stute AC, Thurston RC, Small M, et al. Real-world evaluation of the impact, treatment patterns, and patient and physician perceptions of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause in Europe and the United States. Maturitas. 2021;152:73. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.08.024.
  • Rees M, Bitzer J, Cano A, et al. Global consensus recommendations on menopause in the workplace: a European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) position statement. Maturitas. 2021;151:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.06.006.
  • Wathen CN. Health information seeking in context: how women make decisions regarding hormone replacement therapy. J Health Commun. 2006;11(5):477–493. doi: 10.1080/10810730600751979.
  • Rice VM. Strategies and issues for managing menopause-related symptoms in diverse populations: ethnic and racial diversity. Am J Med. 2005;118 Suppl 12B:142–147. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.048.
  • Hakimi S, Rahimi S, Aghdam AM, et al. The impact of Orem’s model-based self-care training on self-care behavior and the quality of life in postmenopausal Kurdish women: a controlled randomized study. Crescent J Med Biol Sci. 2018;5(3):209–214.
  • Mosallanezhad Z. Health literacy and its relationship with quality of life in postmenopausal women. JCDR. 2019;13:1–5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2019/38474.12529.
  • Khandehroo M, Tavakoly Sany SB, Oakley D, et al. Health literacy intervention and quality of life in menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Health Promot Educ. 2022;60(2):114–126. doi: 10.1080/14635240.2020.1762502.
  • Schover LR, Yuan Y, Fellman BM, et al. Efficacy trial of an internet-based intervention for cancer-related female sexual dysfunction. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(11):1389–1397. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0162.
  • Ma J, Drieling R, Stafford RS. US women desire greater professional guidance on hormone and alternative therapies for menopause symptom management. Menopause. 2006;13(3):506–516. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000179047.00748.53.
  • Koch PB, Mansfield PK. Facing the unknown. Women Ther. 2004;27(3–4):179–194. doi: 10.1300/J015v27n03_13.
  • Ettinger B, Grady D, Tosteson ANA, et al. Effect of the Women’s Health Initiative on women’s decisions to discontinue postmenopausal hormone therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(6):1225–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.08.007.
  • Peng W, Adams J, Sibbritt DW, et al. Critical review of complementary and alternative medicine use in menopause: focus on prevalence, motivation, decision-making, and communication. Menopause. 2014;21(5):536–548. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e3182a46a3e.
  • Theroux R. Women’s decision making during the menopausal transition. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010;22(11):612–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00553.x.
  • Tariq B, Phillips S, Biswakarma R, et al. Women’s knowledge and attitudes to the menopause: a comparison of women over 40 who were in the perimenopause, post menopause and those not in the peri or post menopause. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):460.
  • Lu J, Li K, Zheng X, et al. Prevalence of menopausal symptoms and attitudes towards menopausal hormone therapy in women aged 40-60 years: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):472.
  • Files JA, Kransdorf LN, Ko M, et al. Bioidentical hormone therapy: an assessment of provider knowledge. Maturitas. 2016;94:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.08.014.
  • Pandey SK, Hart JJ, Tiwary S. Women’s health and the internet: understanding emerging trends and implications. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(1):179–191. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00019-9.
  • Vaccaro CM, Capozzi A, Ettore G, et al. What women think about menopause: an italian survey. Maturitas. 2021;147:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.03.007.
  • de Arruda Amaral ICG, Baccaro LF, Lui-Filho JF, et al. Opinions and main sources of information about menopause among middle-aged Brazilian women. Menopause. 2019;26(10):1154–1159. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001378.
  • Tiihonen M, Saarela M, Saarinen S, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy–benefits, adverse reactions, concerns and information sources in 2009. Maturitas. 2011;70(1):69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.06.001.
  • Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Shafiei E, Ghasemi F, et al. A study on women’s health information needs in menopausal age. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):434.
  • Tao M, Teng Y, Shao H, et al. Knowledge, perceptions and information about hormone therapy (HT) among menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024661.
  • Berger M, Wagner TH, Baker LC. Internet use and stigmatized illness. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(8):1821–1827. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.025.
  • Crawford SL. What you don’t know can hurt you: more information and communication are needed regarding menopausal therapies. Menopause. 2017;24(10):1116–1117. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000963.
  • Alfred A, Esterman A, Farmer E, et al. Women’s decision making at menopause – a focus group study. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35(4):270–272.
  • Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
  • NHLBI. Study quality assessment tools. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.
  • Aleksova J, Kuczynska-Burggraf M, Ranasinha S, et al. Information on early menopause: is the internet the place to search? Climacteric. 2017;20(3):248–255. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1301920.
  • Babio GO, Rquez-Calder M, Garca-Gutierrez JF, et al. Women’s autonomy and the evaluation of the information available on the internet on hormone therapy after menopause. Comput Inform Nurs. 2006;24(4):226–234. doi: 10.1097/00024665-200607000-00010.
  • Barnabei VM, O’Connor JJ, Nimphius NM, et al. The effects of a web-based tool on patient-provider communication and satisfaction with hormone therapy: a randomized evaluation. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008;17(1):147–158. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0369.
  • Bucksch J, Kolip P, Deitermann B. Reporting on post-menopausal hormone therapy: an analysis of gynaecologists’ web pages. Med Inform Internet Med. 2004;29(3-4):211–220. doi: 10.1080/14639230400005958.
  • Charbonneau DH. Readability of menopause web sites: a cross-sectional study. J Women Aging. 2012;24(4):280–291. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2012.708574.
  • Charbonneau DH. An analysis of benefits and risk information on pharmaceutical web sites for the treatment of menopause. Health Info Libraries J. 2013;30(3):212–219. doi: 10.1111/hir.12024.
  • Chilet-Rosell E, Martín-Llaguno M, Ruiz-Cantero MT, et al. Hormone replacement therapy advertising: sense and nonsense on the web pages of the best-selling pharmaceuticals in Spain. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-134.
  • Col NF. Using internet technologies to improve and simplify counseling about menopause: the WISDOM website. Maturitas. 2007;57(1):95–99. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.02.020.
  • Cumming GP, Currie HD, Moncur R, et al. Web-based survey on the effect of digital storytelling on empowering women to seek help for urogenital atrophy. Menopause Int. 2010;16(2):51–55. doi: 10.1258/mi.2010.010004.
  • Edwards AL, Shaw PA, Halton CC, et al. “It just makes me feel a little less alone”: a qualitative exploration of the podcast menopause: unmuted on women’s perceptions of menopause. Menopause. 2021;28(12):1374–1384. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001855.
  • Gkrozou F, Tsonis O, Godden M, et al. Mobile Health (mHealth) apps focused on menopause: are they any good? Post Reprod Health. 2019;25(4):191–198. doi: 10.1177/2053369119878978.
  • Hart A, Henwood F, Wyatt S. The role of the internet in patient-practitioner relationships: findings from a qualitative research study. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e36.
  • Kenen RH, Shapiro PJ, Friedman S, et al. Peer-support in coping with medical uncertainty: discussion of oophorectomy and hormone replacement therapy on a web-based message board. Psychooncology. 2007;16(8):763–771. doi: 10.1002/pon.1152.
  • Khan ZM, Kershaw V, Madhuvrata P, et al. Patient experience of telephone consultations in gynaecology: a service evaluation. BJOG. 2021;128(12):1958–1965. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16771.
  • Murtaza F, Shirreff L, Huang LN, et al. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading? Menopause. 2022;29(1):54–62. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001881.
  • Pérez-López FR. An evaluation of the contents and quality of menopause information on the World Wide Web. Maturitas. 2004;49(4):276–282. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.07.006.
  • Reed M, Anderson C. Evaluation of patient information internet web sites about menopause and hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 2002;43(2):135–154. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5122(02)00188-3.
  • Saver BG, Gustafson D, Taylor TR, et al. A tale of two studies: the importance of setting, subjects and context in two randomized, controlled trials of a web-based decision support for perimenopausal and postmenopausal health decisions. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(2):211–222. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.004.
  • Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris PR, et al. How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(9):1853–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.012.
  • Sowter J, Astin F, Dye L, et al. Assessment of the quality and content of website health information about herbal remedies for menopausal symptoms. Maturitas. 2016;88:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.02.016.
  • Trudeau KJ, Ainscough JL, Trant M, et al. Identifying the educational needs of menopausal women: a feasibility study. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(2):145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.10.001.
  • Woods NF, Ismail R, Linder LA, et al. Midlife women’s symptom cluster heuristics: evaluation of an iPad application for data collection. Menopause. 2015;22(10):1058–1066. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000429.
  • Wyatt S, Henwood F, Hart A, et al. The digital divide, health information and everyday life. New Media Soc. 2005;7(2):199–218. doi: 10.1177/1461444805050747.
  • Yuksel N, Treseng L, Malik B, et al. Promotion and marketing of bioidentical hormone therapy on the internet: a content analysis of websites. Menopause. 2017;24(10):1129–1135. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000901.
  • Im E-O, Lee Y, Chee E, et al. Web-based interventions for menopause: a systematic integrated literature review. Maturitas. 2017;95:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.10.009.
  • Kim H, Xie B. Health literacy in the eHealth era: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(6):1073–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.015.
  • Cronin C, Hungerford C, Wilson RL. Using digital health technologies to manage the psychosocial symptoms of menopause in the workplace: a narrative literature review. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2021;42(6):541–548. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2020.1827101.
  • DeNicola N, Marko K. Connected health and mobile apps in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020;47(2):317–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.02.008.
  • Woods NF, Mitchell ES, Adams C. Memory functioning among midlife women: observations from the Seattle Midlife Women’s Health Study. Menopause. 2000;7(4):257–265. doi: 10.1097/00042192-200007040-00008.
  • Cronin C. Understanding the needs of women with adenomyosis through social media. J Nurs Women’s Health. 2017;2:105.
  • Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, et al. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105–111. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105.
  • Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1–47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101.
  • Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JEJr, et al. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3(5):448–457. doi: 10.1007/BF02595921.
  • Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):207–214. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061.
  • Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(14):1727–1734. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1727.
  • Parker S, Zipursky J, Ma H, et al. A web-based multimedia program before colonoscopy increased knowledge and decreased anxiety, sedation requirement, and procedure time. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52(6):519–523. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000958.
  • Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691–2700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.
  • Krawczyk A, Lau E, Perez S, et al. How to inform: comparing written and video education interventions to increase human papillomavirus knowledge and vaccination intentions in young adults. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(4):316–322. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2011.615355.
  • Huh J, Koola J, Contreras A, et al. Consumer health informatics adoption among underserved populations: thinking beyond the digital divide. Yearb Med Inform. 2018;27(01):146–155. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641217.
  • Salisbury T, Deng AT, Burch E, et al. Digital fellowships: inspiring use of contemporary technologies in applied healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):178. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00922-8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.