1,629
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Non-neuronal cell outgrowth in C. elegans

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Article: e1405212 | Received 11 Sep 2017, Accepted 30 Oct 2017, Published online: 07 Dec 2017

ABSTRACT

Cell outgrowth is a hallmark of some non-migratory developing cells during morphogenesis. Understanding the mechanisms that control cell outgrowth not only increases our knowledge of tissue and organ development, but can also shed light on disease pathologies that exhibit outgrowth-like behavior. C. elegans is a highly useful model for the analysis of genes and the function of their respective proteins. In addition, C. elegans also has several cells and tissues that undergo outgrowth during development. Here we discuss the outgrowth mechanisms of nine different C. elegans cells and tissues. We specifically focus on how these cells and tissues grow outward and the interactions they make with their environment. Through our own identification, and a meta-analysis, we also identify gene families involved in multiple cell outgrowth processes, which defined potential C. elegans core components of cell outgrowth, as well as identify a potential stepwise cell behavioral cascade used by cells undergoing outgrowth.

Introduction

During cell morphogenesis, when cells change their shape during development, the process of cell outgrowth, during which a non-migratory cell expands outward in a projection-like path as it changes shape, is also a common event. Examples of normal cell outgrowth during morphogenesis include outgrowth in the mouse facial primodia, outgrowth of regenerating fins in Zebrafish, dramatic outgrowth in Drosophila cardioblast cells, and the development of human neurons.Citation1–4 Cell outgrowth-like behavior is also characteristic of certain diseases such as endometriosis, the outgrowth of endometrium cells outside of the uterus, and in metastatic cancer during the spreading of tumors from one tissue to another.Citation5,6 Therefore, understanding the mechanisms that control cell outgrowth not only sheds light on the genetic inputs that control development, but also provides information on the pathologies of certain diseases.

C. elegans is a small free-living nematode whose cell lineage is stereotypic and well-characterized.Citation7–11 This model organism is also transparent, making it a powerful tool to study cell morphology. Though much of C. elegans development consists of cells dividing and taking on different fates, certain cell types undergo outgrowth during morphogenesis. In this review, we describe the mechanisms used during outgrowth for nine non-neuronal cell types. We specifically focus on non-neuronal cells as numerous neuronal cells that undergo outgrowth have already been well discussed,Citation12–18 and addressing each neuronal cell type would result in content that would encompass its own review.

We will describe and compare the cell outgrowth processes in the uterine seam cell (utse), the anchor cell (AC), the vulval sex muscles, the muscle arms, the male tail, the excretory cell, the head mesodermal cells, and during two events of embryonic development, dorsal intercalation and ventral enclosure.

The utse and vulval sex muscles

The C. elegans utse attaches the uterus to the lateral epithelial seam cells of the body wall.Citation18 The utse forms from the fusion of eight cells, that require the expression of the Notch family receptor LIN-12 and its Delta family ligand LAG-2, as well as the fusogen AFF-1.Citation19–27 After fusion, the outgrowth process of the utse occurs over an eight hour period as the utse cell body grows bi-directionally along the anterior-posterior axis, and the utse nuclei segregate into two groups migrating along the anterior-posterior axis and settling at the anterior/posterior edges of the utse cell body ().Citation19,26 The utse cell body extends ahead of its nuclei during outgrowth, indicating that separate mechanisms control the movement of the cell body and the nuclei.Citation26

Figure 1. utse outgrowth over time. Schematic of utse outgrowth over time (A) Early L4 vulva and uterus. The utse has just formed at this stage after the fusion of eight ρ cells and the anchor cell. The cell has an ellipsoidal shape. Outlines indicate positions of vulva and uterus. utse is indicated in red. Blue dashed arrows indicate direction of outgrowth. (B) Mid L4 vulva and uterus. utse has begun elongating along the anterior-posterior axis. Outlines indicate positions of vulva and uterus. utse is indicated in red. (C) L4 lethargus vulva and uterus. utse has completed its outgrowth, and has taken on an elongated shape with the edges of its arms extending along the dorsal/ventral axis. Outlines indicate positions of vulva and uterus. utse is indicated in red.

Figure 1. utse outgrowth over time. Schematic of utse outgrowth over time (A) Early L4 vulva and uterus. The utse has just formed at this stage after the fusion of eight ρ cells and the anchor cell. The cell has an ellipsoidal shape. Outlines indicate positions of vulva and uterus. utse is indicated in red. Blue dashed arrows indicate direction of outgrowth. (B) Mid L4 vulva and uterus. utse has begun elongating along the anterior-posterior axis. Outlines indicate positions of vulva and uterus. utse is indicated in red. (C) L4 lethargus vulva and uterus. utse has completed its outgrowth, and has taken on an elongated shape with the edges of its arms extending along the dorsal/ventral axis. Outlines indicate positions of vulva and uterus. utse is indicated in red.

During outgrowth, the utse requires the presence of several cells within the C. elegans uterus. Four uterine toroids line the lumen of the uterus, denoted uterine toroid 1 to uterine toroid 4, with numbers increasing for cells that are more distal to the vulva.Citation19 The presence of uterine toroid 1 and uterine toroid 2 is essential for proper utse outgrowth as ablation of these cells leads to defects in utse outgrowth.Citation26 In addition, the vulval sex muscles, which lie proximal and distal to the utse on either side of the body wall, are also necessary for utse outgrowth; ablation of the vulval sex muscle precursors, and knockdown of genes expressed in the vulval sex muscles, lead to defects in utse outgrowth development. During egg-laying, vulval sex muscles contract to open the vulva and allow eggs to be laid. Vulval sex muscles develop from the M cell that divides to create precursors for body wall muscles, coelomocytes, and two sex myoblasts. Through the function of egl-15, the sex myoblasts migrate, divide, and arrange into four sections within the uterine/vulval area, during the L3 stage. The two sections that lie proximal to the vulva become vulval sex muscles, vm1 and vm2, and the two sections distal to the vulva become uterine muscles. The vulval sex muscles undergo outgrowth when they extend processes ventrally to attach the vulva to the hypodermis, as well as longitudinally towards the seam cells ().Citation9,17 The function of unc-53 has been shown to be necessary for generating these longitudinal processes,Citation17 as unc-53 mutants do not form these processes and result in the muscles attaching to myofilaments and developing a rounded shape.

Figure 2. Vulval sex muscle outgrowth. Schematic of a sex myoblast at the L3 larval stage. A cross section of an L3 vulva shows that a sex myoblast daughter cell (in red) is in between the vulval epithelium and the seam cells of the hypodermis. Sex myoblasts extend protrusions ventrally towards the vulva and laterally towards the seam cells.

Figure 2. Vulval sex muscle outgrowth. Schematic of a sex myoblast at the L3 larval stage. A cross section of an L3 vulva shows that a sex myoblast daughter cell (in red) is in between the vulval epithelium and the seam cells of the hypodermis. Sex myoblasts extend protrusions ventrally towards the vulva and laterally towards the seam cells.

Similar to the sex muscles, cells and tissues surrounding the utse express several gene families that have also been shown to be involved in utse development. The uterine toroids express genes encoding a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (unc-73) and its interacting factors (let-502, rho-1, unc-13, and unc-64), and genes encoding Rab-like and RabGTPases (rab-1, rab-5, rab-6.1, rab-10, rab-11.1, and rsef-1). The vulval sex muscles express genes that encode migration-signaling proteins (unc-53 and egl-15). In addition, genes expressed by the anchor cell that mediate its invasion (aff-1, cdh-3, egl-43, fos-1, him-4, ina-1, lag-2, mig-10, pat-3, and zif-1) also act on the utse.

Furthermore, through an RNAi screen (S. Ghosh et al., in preparation) we identified 52 additional genes that influenced utse cell outgrowth. These genes encode proteins involved in gene expression and regulation (DAF-16, EGL-13, F11A10.5, IMA-1, IMA2, IMA-3, IMB-2, IMB-3, LIN-11, LIN-31, LIN-39, PQN-85, RAN-2, RAN-3, TTX-3, VAB-3, ZAG-1, ZFH-2, ZFP-1), signal transduction (CWN-1, GIPC-1, GIPC-2, GLB-12, GLP-1, ITR-1, MIG-15, RCC-1, SAX-1), cellular vesicle transport (AMPH-1, DH11.5, SEC-15), cytoskeleton dynamics and binding (ANC-1, ARX-2, ARX-3, DEB-1, FRM-2, GEX-1/WVE-1, GEX-2, LIM-9, NUD-2, TOCA-1, UNC-70, UNC-83, UNC-84, UNC-97), extracellular matrix proteins (FBL-1, LMN-1), and cellular adhesion and migration (NCAM-1, PXL-1, SAX-7, SRSX-18, UNC-33). Taken together, it appears that the utse is highly sensitive to perturbations of a broad range of cell biological functions.

The anchor cell

The AC undergoes cell outgrowth when it invades the underlying basement membrane to interact with vulval epithelial cells and establish vulval cell fates.Citation28 During the L3 larval stage, the AC extends a process ventrally to mediate a connection with the descendants of the 1° vulval precursor cell P6.p ().Citation28,30 Once P6.p reaches the two-cell stage (mid L3) (), the basement membrane underneath the AC is interrupted, and the basolateral portion of the AC crosses the membrane (). When P6.p reaches the four-cell stage (mid to late L3), the AC extends a fine cellular process that reaches ventrally between the P6.pap and P6.ppa cells (). This invasive structure remains in place as the P6.p granddaughter cells continue to divide and the vulva invaginates. By the L3 lethargus/early L4 stage, the AC positions itself in the dorsal apex of the vulva and has completed its outgrowth process. The AC then induces the surrounding ventral uterine cells to generate the utse cell body.Citation24,26,27

Figure 3. Anchor cell invasion. Schematic anchor cell invasion. Anchor cell shown in red, vulva shown in gray. Basement membrane shown in thick line. Adapted from Ihara et al., 2011 and Hagedorn and Sherwood, 2011. (A) Anchor cell at P6.p two cell stage during mid L3. Basement membrane (shown in thick line) is intact. Anchor cell is dorsal to the P6.p 1° VPC daughters (two circles below). (B) Anchor cell at P6.p four cell stage during mid to late L3. Anchor cell has generated a gap in the basement membrane (see separation between thick lines). Edges of the anchor cell are still in contact with the basement membrane. (C) Anchor cell at P6.p late four-cell stage (late L3). The anchor cell has begun forming protrusions that will invade the vulva (dashed purple arrow). (D) Anchor cell at P6.p late four-cell stage (late L3). The anchor cell has completely invaded the vulva, specifically invading between the 1° VPC granddaughters. (E) Anchor cell at early L4 stage. The 1◦ VPCs have divided and proximal cells are shown. Vulval invagination has occurred and anchor cell will soon fuse with the ρ cells to form the utse.

Figure 3. Anchor cell invasion. Schematic anchor cell invasion. Anchor cell shown in red, vulva shown in gray. Basement membrane shown in thick line. Adapted from Ihara et al., 2011 and Hagedorn and Sherwood, 2011. (A) Anchor cell at P6.p two cell stage during mid L3. Basement membrane (shown in thick line) is intact. Anchor cell is dorsal to the P6.p 1° VPC daughters (two circles below). (B) Anchor cell at P6.p four cell stage during mid to late L3. Anchor cell has generated a gap in the basement membrane (see separation between thick lines). Edges of the anchor cell are still in contact with the basement membrane. (C) Anchor cell at P6.p late four-cell stage (late L3). The anchor cell has begun forming protrusions that will invade the vulva (dashed purple arrow). (D) Anchor cell at P6.p late four-cell stage (late L3). The anchor cell has completely invaded the vulva, specifically invading between the 1° VPC granddaughters. (E) Anchor cell at early L4 stage. The 1◦ VPCs have divided and proximal cells are shown. Vulval invagination has occurred and anchor cell will soon fuse with the ρ cells to form the utse.

The presence of the 1° vulval cells are required for the initiation of AC outgrowth.Citation28 The 1° vulval cells are specified via LIN-3 signaling from the AC in late L2 to early L3 larval stage.Citation29 Without the AC, all vulval precursor cells take on the 3° fate and become external epithelial cells.Citation30–33 lin-3 mutants, which have 3° vulval cells instead of 1° vulval cells, do not exhibit AC outgrowth.Citation28 Also, when the P8.p is ectopically induced by ablating all other vulval precursor cells in the L2 stage, the AC directs its projections to the distal P8.p cells which indicates that a long-range cue from the 1° vulval cells induces outgrowth.

Several genes are involved in inducing AC outgrowth and removing the basement membrane underlying the AC. A key pathway necessary for AC outgrowth involves the expression of the gene fos-1 (C-FOS transcription factor), and five genes that encode the downstream effectors of FOS-1: zmp-1 (zinc metalloprotease), cdh-3 (protocadherin), egl-43 (zinc finger protein), him-4 (hemicentin), and mig-10 (lamellopodin).Citation34–37 Other genes encoding proteins involved in genetic interactions that promote outgrowth include: zif-1 and cdc-42, which promote the interaction between E3 ubiquitin ligase substrate-recognition subunit; unc-6 and unc-40, which promotes outgrowth through enrichment of the actin regulators, F-actin, and phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate (PtdIns (4, 5) P2) with netrin (UNC-6) in the basement membrane and corresponding netrin receptor (UNC-40) in the AC plasma membrane; ina-1 and pat-3, which targets the netrin receptor to the plasma membrane of the AC; hlh-2, which regulates levels of protocadherin and hemicentin in a separate pathway from fos-1; vrk-1, which regulates polarity of protrusions; aff-1, which encodes a fusogen that allows the AC to fuse with the utse syncytium, and madd-2, which prevents ectopic invasive structures from emanating from the AC.Citation38–47

Muscle arms

The plasma membrane of body wall muscles extend protrusions to motor neurons, called muscle arms, in order to make neuromuscular junctions ().Citation48–50 Muscle arms contain a thin stalk from the body wall muscle and have bifurcated ends.Citation49 Actin is required to generate the outgrowth extensions of the muscle arms, as knockdown of actin genes, act-1,act-2, act-3, reduces their formation. Of the 95 body wall muscles, 79 create muscle arms, of which 16 outgrow from the neck to the nerve ring, and the remaining 63 outgrow towards the nearest motor neuron on the nerve cord. When motor neurons take on aberrant paths, muscle arm outgrowth follows the path of those aberrant neurons, indicating that muscle arms respond to chemoattractant cues from motor neurons.Citation51 Muscle arms are also thought to direct their outgrowth in relation to areas containing dense core vesicles, as seen in unc-104 mutants, in which muscle arms extend towards areas with increased localization of dense core vesicles.Citation50,52

Figure 4. Muscle arm extension. Schematic of muscle arm extension. Adapted from Dixon and Roy, 2005. Example of muscle arms throughout the C. elegans body (light blue arrows). Muscle arms have formed from the dorsal body wall muscles (end of dark blue arrow) towards the dorsal nerve cord.

Figure 4. Muscle arm extension. Schematic of muscle arm extension. Adapted from Dixon and Roy, 2005. Example of muscle arms throughout the C. elegans body (light blue arrows). Muscle arms have formed from the dorsal body wall muscles (end of dark blue arrow) towards the dorsal nerve cord.

A screen performed by Alexander et al.Citation53 identified ten genes necessary for muscle arm outgrowth: gex-2, madd-2, unc-33, unc-40, unc-51, unc-54, unc-60, unc-73, unc-93, and unc-95. Knockdown of these genes cause a muscle arm extension defect, known as a MAD defect. The cofilin UNC-60 specifically affects muscle arm extension by regulating actin-severing activity.Citation49 Tropomyosin is known to antagonize cofilin activity, and C. elegans tropomyosin, LEV-11, acts to stabilize actin in muscle arms.Citation49,54–57 The ADAM ortholog MADD-4 and netrin signaling (eva-1, unc-6, unc-40,) work together to form and guide muscle arm outgrowth.Citation58,59 Netrin signaling also mediates the gene expression of lin-12 and madd-2 to affect muscle arm development.Citation60,61

Other genes involved in muscle arm outgrowth include pat-2, pat-4, pat-6, unc-52, lam-1, lam-2, and epi-1.Citation62 The dense body components (unc-97 and unc-98), as well as components of the WAVE complex (gex-1/wve-1 and wsp-1) also regulate muscle arm extension. Myosin heavy chain B, UNC-54, is also necessary for muscle arm formation, as loss-of-function unc-54 mutants contain fewer muscle arms and changes in arm width.Citation49,60 The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) pathway is also involved in regulating muscle arm formation; when let-756 (FGF), egl-15 (FGF receptor), or sem-5 (adaptor protein GRB2) genes are knocked down, ectopic muscle membrane extensions form.Citation62 Loss-of-function of other FGF signaling components such as, egl-17, let-60, ptp-2, soc-1, soc-2 and sos-1 also result in ectopic muscle extensions. The body wall muscle-expressed tyrosine phosphatase receptor CLR-1 inhibits EGL-15 activity, suppresses the EME phenotype from egl-15 knockdown, and causes the MAD phenotype when knocked down on its own.Citation62,63

The male tail

The male tail consists of the fan, the rays, the spicules, the proctodeum, the gubernaculum, and the hook ().Citation64,65 Cell outgrowth occurs during fan and ray formation, therefore we characterized the development and molecular inputs for these two processes.Citation66

Figure 5. Male tail cell shape change and outgrowth. Schematic of male tail retraction and ray formation from L3 to adulthood. Adapted from Nguyen et al., 1999. (A) Male tail at L3 stage, retraction and ray formation have not occurred and entire cell is composed of tail epithelium. (B) Beginning of tail retraction in L4. Light red indicates fluid-filled extracellular space previously inhabited by tail epithelium. (C) L4 stage. Continuation of retraction in male tail, start of ray formation. (D) L4 stage, male tail has finished retracting and rays have all formed. (E) Adult male tail. Rays have reached their final shape. Fluid-filled extracellular space has taken peloderan shape.

Figure 5. Male tail cell shape change and outgrowth. Schematic of male tail retraction and ray formation from L3 to adulthood. Adapted from Nguyen et al., 1999. (A) Male tail at L3 stage, retraction and ray formation have not occurred and entire cell is composed of tail epithelium. (B) Beginning of tail retraction in L4. Light red indicates fluid-filled extracellular space previously inhabited by tail epithelium. (C) L4 stage. Continuation of retraction in male tail, start of ray formation. (D) L4 stage, male tail has finished retracting and rays have all formed. (E) Adult male tail. Rays have reached their final shape. Fluid-filled extracellular space has taken peloderan shape.

The male rays and fan originate from the lateral epidermal seam cells, of which the three most posterior give rise to the ray precursor cells, or Rn.p cells.Citation64 These Rn.p cells eventually generate nine pairs of sensory rays.Citation67 During the late L4 stage, the tip of the tail becomes rounded and retracts anteriorly by losing adhesion with the cuticle, leaving behind a clear fluid in the extracellular space ().Citation64,68 The ray cells form papillae on the edge of the tail cell body ( and ), and these papillae eventually become the distal edges of the rays, which attach to the fan cuticle through an adherens junction ().Citation67,69 As the fan extends from the cell body, it pulls the papillae with it, allowing the rays to extend outward.

The expression of several genes is required for the formation of the rays. mab-21 is necessary for maintaining cell shape in ray 6. In wild-type males, ray 6 is thicker and more conical than other rays, whereas in mab-21 mutants, ray 6 takes on the morphology of other rays, and also, exhibit an ectopic tenth papillae between rays 5 and 7. The Smad genes sma-2, sma-3 and smad-4 are necessary for preventing rays 5 and 7 from taking on ray 6 morphology. Similarly, mutants for daf-4, mab-20, mab-21, mab-26, sma-2, sma-3, and sma-4 can have rays that are fused together, caused by displacement of papillae prior to retraction.Citation66–71 The ram genes ram-1, ram-2 and ram-4, affect collagen within the male tail, as mutants of these genes exhibit rays with an expanded, lumpy shape.Citation65–72 Other genes that affect ray shape include dpy-11, which encodes the thioredoxin-like protein, and dpy-18, which encodes a collagen hydroxylase.Citation73–75 In addition, mab-7 and ram-5 transcription gene expression mediates communication between the ray cells and the hypodermis.Citation65–76

A variety of molecular inputs have also been characterized for male tail retraction. The expression of tlp-1, which encodes a C2H2 Zn-finger presumptive transcription factor, promotes hyp8–11 anterior retraction.Citation77 The doublesex-related DM gene dmd-3 is necessary to trigger retraction during the L4 stage.Citation78 When defects in retraction are present, ray formation is often also affected. The RBCC (Ring finger-B box-Coiled coil) protein LIN-41 functions with LET-7 to regulate male tail retraction.Citation79 Reduction-of-function lin-41 mutants begin retraction in the L3 stage, and either form disrupted fans or rays, or no fans or rays at all. The hox gene egl-5 mediates the retraction of cells other than hyp8–11, and in egl-5 mutants, rays and the fan do not form.Citation80 The gene let-765, encoding the strawberry notch 1 receptor is also necessary for retraction and ray formation as let-765 mutants with reduced function do not form rays or fans.Citation81 RME-8, which is necessary for receptor-mediated endocytosis, also plays a role in both retraction and ray and fan morphogenesis. RNAi against rme-8 causes defects in the disruption of these behaviors.Citation82 Furthermore, Nelson et al. identified 25 other genes that are involved in male tail retraction.Citation82 These genes encode proteins involved in cellular transport (abcx-1, arl-1, wht-5), cellular organization (inx-12, inx-13, nmy-2, ptl-1), nuclear transport (expo-2, nnp-3, nnp-6), signal transduction (bub-1, cdc-42, nhr-25, pkl-1, rcn-1) and general gene expression and regulation (blmp-1, cdt-1, egl-18, mix-1, nob-1, php-3, pri-2, ran-3, rpa-1, smc-4).

Excretory cell

The excretory cell is the largest mono-nuclear cell in C. elegans.Citation83 As this review focuses on cell outgrowth, the lumen formation of the excretory cell will not be discussed. The excretory cell originates from the AB blastomere within the embryo, specifically AB plpappaap.Citation11 During the three-fold embryonic stage, this cell grows outward dorsolaterally toward the lateral midline ().Citation83,84 The proximal and distal edges of the cell, known as canals, initially grow outward dorsally (), then branch out and extend anteriorly and posteriorly (). By the time the worm hatches, the posterior canal has extended outward measuring half the length of the organism. Extension is completed within the L1 stage 12–14 hours after hatch, when the canal spans the entire worm body from the anterior tip to the tip of the tail ().Citation85 The canal connects to the hypodermis through gap junctions, and once the canal extension is completed, the canal grows as the body of the worm grows, expanding from approximately 300 µm at the L1 stage to 1 mm as an adult size.Citation84

Figure 6. Excretory cell outgrowth. Schematic of excretory cell outgrowth. Excretory cell in red, outline of worm in black. Adapted from Buechner et al., 2002. (A-D) Excretory cell outgrowth during three-fold embryonic stage. (A) Excretory cell at birth, cell has a spherical shape. (B) Cell takes on an ellipsoidal shape as it begins to grow laterally from left to right over the ventral muscle quadrants. (C) Apical and basal edges of the excretory cell begin migrating dorsally. (D) Edges of dorsal protrusions bifurcate and begin to grow outward laterally along the anterior posterior axis. (E) Completed excretory cell outgrowth (L1). Cell has extended laterally along the anterior-posterior axis to span the entire length of the worm.

Figure 6. Excretory cell outgrowth. Schematic of excretory cell outgrowth. Excretory cell in red, outline of worm in black. Adapted from Buechner et al., 2002. (A-D) Excretory cell outgrowth during three-fold embryonic stage. (A) Excretory cell at birth, cell has a spherical shape. (B) Cell takes on an ellipsoidal shape as it begins to grow laterally from left to right over the ventral muscle quadrants. (C) Apical and basal edges of the excretory cell begin migrating dorsally. (D) Edges of dorsal protrusions bifurcate and begin to grow outward laterally along the anterior posterior axis. (E) Completed excretory cell outgrowth (L1). Cell has extended laterally along the anterior-posterior axis to span the entire length of the worm.

The tail hypodermis acts in mediating excretory cell outgrowth.Citation83,86 Mutations in genes that control tail hypodermis integrity, lin-17 and bli-6, result in exaggerated posterior canal growth.Citation87 Several basement membrane proteins are also necessary for proper excretory canal outgrowth. These include both α integrins INA-1 and PAT-2 and their corresponding β integrin PAT-3; perlecan UNC-52, and laminins EPI-1 and LAM-1.Citation88–92 In pat-3 mutants, canals grow approximately 30% slower than in wild type animals during the L1 stage and do not reach the ends of the animal. Canals continue to grow with the rest of the animal throughout the later larval stages, but they do not extend further along the hypodermis, indicating that separate mechanisms control initial canal outgrowth, and later, passive canal growth as the worm develops. The seam cells may also affect excretory cell outgrowth, since knockdown of cdh-3, which is expressed in the seam, leads to outgrowth defects.Citation92

Other genes that are involved in promoting excretory cell outgrowth are mig-10, mig-15, unc-34, unc-53, unc-71, unc-73, unc-104, unc-116, and vab-8.Citation12,14,17,93–100 The kinesin motor proteins UNC-104 and VAB-8 act with ROBO signaling proteins, SAX-3, SLT-1, and EVA-1, in the excretory cell to mediate cell migration and transport.Citation95 Another gene that acts in multiple pathways in excretory cell outgrowth is abi-1.Citation84 ABI-1 acts with both MIG-10 and UNC-53 to promote outgrowth of the excretory cell by inducing branched actin accumulation through activation of the Arp2/3 complex.Citation84,99 Lastly, expression of unc-5 and unc-6 provides netrin signaling that mediates dorsal guidance cues for the canals.Citation51,101,102 Many of the genes discussed, as well as lin-17 and bli-6, also affect guidance of neurons, indicating that they could be serving as diffusible cues from the basal surface to affect outgrowth of multiple tissues.Citation83

Head mesodermal cells

Head mesodermal cells are branched cells that lie dorsal to the terminal bulb of the pharynx ().Citation11,103 These cells, which originate from hmcR and hmcL (head mesodermal cell right and head mesodermal cell left), migrate circumferentially to the dorsal midline.Citation103 Once they reach the dorsal midline, the hmcR undergoes programmed cell death and the hmcL extends processes anteriorly and posteriorly along the dorsal and ventral margins of the body wall.Citation103 These two branches split at the pharynx and grow adjacent to the terminal bulb of the pharynx. The ventral process grows along the anterior loop of the right excretory gland and adjacent to the ventral hypodermal ridge. This process also runs adjacent to the body wall muscle and makes gap junctions with the body wall muscle.Citation104 The dorsal process grows adjacent to the dorsal hypodermal ridge and also makes gap junctions with dorsal muscle arms.

Figure 7. Head mesodermal cell. Schematic of head mesodermal cell. Positioning of head mesodermal cell in adult worm. Head mesodermal cell lies dorsomedial to the terminal bulb of the pharynx. It extends processes that split at the pharynx and extend anteriorly and posteriorly along the dorsal and ventral margins of the body wall. These processes also lie adjacent to the intestine as well as the excretory gland cell. Adapted from Altun and Hall, 2009.

Figure 7. Head mesodermal cell. Schematic of head mesodermal cell. Positioning of head mesodermal cell in adult worm. Head mesodermal cell lies dorsomedial to the terminal bulb of the pharynx. It extends processes that split at the pharynx and extend anteriorly and posteriorly along the dorsal and ventral margins of the body wall. These processes also lie adjacent to the intestine as well as the excretory gland cell. Adapted from Altun and Hall, 2009.

UNC-39, the homolog of human myotonic dystrophy-associated homeodomain protein SIX5, is involved in regulating the outgrowth of the processes formed by head mesodermal cells.Citation105 When unc-39 is knocked down, ectopic processes form around the nerve ring, and posteriorly directed processes become shorter. In addition, netrin and its receptors (unc-5, unc-6, and unc-40) affect hmcL cell body positioning but not arm projections.Citation51

Outgrowth processes during embryonic development

The epidermal cells of C. elegans are generated during the 9th round of embryonic cell divisions, at which point the embryo comprises 365 cells.Citation106–108 Epidermal cells originate from four lineages, ABarp, ABpla, ABpra, and C. These cells undergo several rounds of division, with the majority of epidermal cells localizing to the dorsal region of the embryo. Once terminal divisions are complete, three groups of major epidermal cells are generated: the dorsal epidermal cells, seam epidermal cells, and ventral epidermal cells. The dorsal and ventral epidermal cells take on a sheet-like shape and undergo morphogenetic movements to encase the remaining cells of the embryo. Before the embryo can undergo elongation, two morphogenetic movements must occur, dorsal intercalation and ventral enclosure.Citation109 Both dorsal intercalation and ventral enclosure require changes in cell shape and outgrowth, and we discuss them here.

Dorsal intercalation

Dorsal intercalation is the process by which dorsal epidermal cells form a single row across the dorsal midline.Citation11,109,110 During this process, dorsal epidermal cells arrange themselves into six rows and change their morphology from a round shape to a wedge shape ().Citation109 These cells then begin intercalating, with the anterior cells interdigitating first, followed by the remaining cells along the anterior-posterior axis (). The interdigitating cells intercalate by forming basolateral protrusions (), which touch neighboring cells and help them move towards one another.Citation106,109–112

Figure 8. Dorsal intercalation. Schematic of dorsal intercalation. Adapted from Chisholm and Hardin, 2005. (A) Dorsal view of embryo undergoing intercalation. Intercalating epidermal cells shown in red. Dashed lines indicate cells that have already intercalated. Cells that are intercalating are changing from a rounded shape to a more wedge/protrusion-like shape. (B) Expanded view of intercalating cells. Basolateral protrusions that also touch neighboring cells, and help the intercalating cells move towards one another.

Figure 8. Dorsal intercalation. Schematic of dorsal intercalation. Adapted from Chisholm and Hardin, 2005. (A) Dorsal view of embryo undergoing intercalation. Intercalating epidermal cells shown in red. Dashed lines indicate cells that have already intercalated. Cells that are intercalating are changing from a rounded shape to a more wedge/protrusion-like shape. (B) Expanded view of intercalating cells. Basolateral protrusions that also touch neighboring cells, and help the intercalating cells move towards one another.

Molecular inputs controlling the change in cell morphology, from round to wedge shape, have been characterized. The T-box transcription factors TBX-8 and TBX-9 are inputs for this process, as animals with RNAi knockdown of tbx-8 and tbx-9 do not form wedge shaped cells and intercalation arrests prematurely.Citation113 Another gene that affects cell shape of dorsal epidermal cells is sax-3, which encodes a ROBO receptor protein that functions cell autonomously within the dorsal epidermal cells.Citation114

Additional genes that promote dorsal intercalation include genes that encode cytoskeleton structure proteins (arx-2, gex-1/wve-1), GTPases (gex-2, gex-3, ced-10), and signaling proteins (apr-1, frk-1, mig-5, rib-1, and ten-1).Citation115–123 Though all of these genes are necessary for induction of dorsal intercalation, none have been characterized to promote protrusion formation. Dorsal intercalation and protrusion formation may be uncoupled behaviors, for in die-1 mutants protrusions form normally, but intercalation does not occur.Citation112 Therefore, it may be useful to further analyze genes that have been implicated in dorsal intercalation for roles in dorsal protrusion formation.

Ventral enclosure

During ventral enclosure, ventral epidermal cells move towards the ventral midline to encase underlying cells in an epithelial sheath.Citation106 Specifically, the epidermal sheet migrates laterally and ventrally to encase the embryo ().Citation124 This process commences when two anterior leading cells, known as ventral marginal cells (), extend large protrusions towards the ventral midline and form epithelial junctions.Citation106,124 Once these cells reach the midline, the remaining cells, known as ventral pocket cells (), move towards the midline by extending protrusions and encase the embryo. The presence of ventral marginal cells is necessary to mediate the rest of the ventral enclosure, for if the marginal cells are ablated, ventral enclosure cannot occur.Citation124 Marginal and pocket cell protrusions consist of actin filaments at the apical domain, which constrict as the ventral pocket closes.

Figure 9. Ventral Enclosure. Schematic of ventral enclosure. Adapted from Chisholm and Hardin, 2005. Ventral epidermal cells shown in red, neuroblasts shown in gray spheres. (A) Outgrowth of epidermal cells during ventral enclosure. Ventral marginal cells are indicated with blue arrow and pocket cells are indicated with green arrow. (B) Expanded view of ventral epidermal cells moving along the neuroblast substratum.

Figure 9. Ventral Enclosure. Schematic of ventral enclosure. Adapted from Chisholm and Hardin, 2005. Ventral epidermal cells shown in red, neuroblasts shown in gray spheres. (A) Outgrowth of epidermal cells during ventral enclosure. Ventral marginal cells are indicated with blue arrow and pocket cells are indicated with green arrow. (B) Expanded view of ventral epidermal cells moving along the neuroblast substratum.

The formation of marginal and pocket cell protrusions is modulated by several molecular cues. The WAVE complex (GEX-2, GEX-3, WSP-1), WASP (WIP-1), and Ena/VASP (UNC-34) activate the Arp2/3 complex (ARX-1, ARX-2, ARX-3, ARX-4, ARX-5, ARX-6. ARX-7), which enables actin polymerization at the leading edge of ventral marginal cells.Citation116,119,125 Knock down of components of each of these complexes results in defects in ventral enclosure. The 1,4,5-inositol trisphosphate (IP3) receptor ITR-1 is also necessary for generating filopodia and organizing actin at the leading edge of marginal cells.Citation126 The cadherin-catenin complex (CCC), consisting of cadherin (HMR-1), α-catenin (HMP-1) and β-catenin (HMP-2), is also necessary for enabling protrusions to make adhesive contacts with the ventral midline.Citation127–129

Other proteins that affect protrusion formation include the receptor tyrosine kinase VAB-1 and its ligands VAB-2, EFN-2 and EFN-3, which properly direct protrusions in both marginal and pocket cells.Citation130–133 The semaphorin MAB-20 is necessary for preventing the formation of ectopic protrusions in the ventral pocket cells.Citation134,135 The Plexin PLX-2 binds with MAB-20, but acts redundantly with MAB-20 and VAB-1 to generate protrusions in the pocket cells.Citation133,136 DPY-18, the catalytic subunit of collagen prolyl 4-hydroxylase, acts with TEN-1 (tenurin) to prevent ectopic protrusion formation in dpy-18:ten-1 double mutant animals, in which ventral protrusions were present after ventral enclosure had completed.Citation137 Dishevelled (DSH-2) is necessary for mediating the length of the protrusions formed by marginal cells, for dsh-2 mutants have marginal cells with longer protrusions than normal.Citation138 Likewise, dsh-2 mutant marginal cell protrusive activity also lags behind pocket cell protrusion formation, which prevents ventral enclosure from occurring.

Genes that affect ventral enclosure but not protrusion formation have also been characterized. The expression of these genes affect migration of epidermal cells and include the APC-related gene apr-1, as well as rib-1 and rib-2, which are involved in heparan sulfate biosynthesis.Citation115,139 Expression of kal-1 (kallikrein) with efn-4 (ephrin-B2) mediate ventral epidermal cell migration.Citation140 The expression of wip-1 activates WASP and affects ventral epidermal cell migration, but since WSP-1 affects protrusion formation, WIP-1 may also act in the protrusion formation pathway.Citation141 The Fer-related kinase-1 FRK-1 also affects enclosure.Citation121 Actin distribution is normal in mutants of the polymerase-associated factor 1 complex (PAF1C) member ctr-9; however, defects in closure are present.Citation142 The anilin ANI-1 is necessary for aligning cells as they come together during enclosure.Citation143 Lastly, the GTPase Arl2 homolog EVL-20 is necessary for mediating integrity of the hypodermis during ventral enclosure.Citation144

Analysis of pathways

In this review we have discussed 205 genes involved in nine different examples of cell outgrowth (). To determine which genes might act as key regulators of non-neuronal cell outgrowth in C. elegans, we identified genes that control cell outgrowth in multiple tissues, as well as examined those genes affecting multiple different tissues, and found that 44 genes were involved in affecting outgrowth in more than one tissue (). This analysis demonstrated that two genes, gex-2 and unc-6, controlled outgrowth in four different tissues. Interestingly, these two genes belong to families that are also involved in neuronal cell outgrowth.

Table 1. Genes involved in cell outhgrowth.

GEX-2 is a member of the WAVE/SCAR complex necessary for actin initiation, and many components of the WAVE/SCAR complex are involved in multiple tissues characterized in this work (as described below). Expression of gex-1/wve-1 is involved in the utse, dorsal intercalation and muscle arms.Citation26,53,116 Expression of gex-3 is involved in dorsal intercalation, ventral enclosure, and muscle arm extension.Citation49,116,117 Expression of netrin (unc-6) is well-characterized to provide signaling guidance cues. The netrin receptor unc-40 is involved in regulating outgrowth in the anchor cell, ventral enclosure, muscle arm extension, and head mesodermal cell positioning.Citation40,53,58,59,99 Taken together we believe that these two master cell outgrowth regulators function in multiple tissues and are differentially activated through interaction with other pathways.

Based on all available information, ten genes are shared by at least three cell types or tissues. These genes encoded proteins involved in cytoskeletal dynamics (ARX-2, PAT-3), signal transduction (EGL-15, GEX-1/WVE-1, UNC-40, UNC-53, UNC-73), and adhesion (CDH-3, INA-1, MIG-10). Interestingly, of these genes, cdh-3, ina-1, pat-3, and mig-10, were all commonly expressed in the utse, AC, and excretory cell, suggesting that connections to the cytoskeleton and ECM networks are vital for outgrowth.

Behaviors undertaken by outgrowing cells

The core components gex-2 and unc-6 affect different aspects of cell behavior. gex-2 is involved in branched actin initiation and modulating cell outgrowth in systems that generate actin-like protrusions during outgrowth,Citation116 while UNC-6 serves as a guidance cue.Citation51,96 In addition, attachment and connections to the surrounding cytoskeletal and ECM structures were equally important for outgrowth processes, therefore we wanted to see if these broader mechanisms are used for cell outgrowth by other genes in the nine tissues we described (). Specifically, we determined if each of these tissues had protrusions that contained actin/branched actin, used guidance cues or made direct contact with their environment, and modulated levels of basement membrane proteins and adhesion complexes. Of the nine examples of non-neuronal cell outgrowth, we observed that aside from early elongation and the vulval sex muscles (whose protrusive mechanisms have not been well characterized), each cell type uses two or more of these mechanisms for outgrowth. Strikingly, the excretory cell uses all five of these mechanisms as determined from our initial core component gene set.

Table 2. Characteristics used by different outgrowth systems.

Our meta-analysis indicates that non-neuronal cells in C. elegans rely on more than one mechanism for cell outgrowth. We show that not only is outgrowth not confined to one pathway or family of genes, but requires multiple players. When cells form a protrusion, they must guide the protrusion in the proper direction, while maintaining adhesive contacts with the extracellular matrix.

This stepwise set of behaviors is also characteristic of cell outgrowth in other organisms. For instance, branch formation in mammary tissues requires regulation of actin polymerization, manipulation of levels of ECM and adhesion molecules, and contact with surrounding cells and guidance cues.Citation145–149 Mouse mammary gland branch formation occurs during adolescence and involves a two-step process.Citation147 The duct cells first elongate through the fat pad (fatty tissue in the mammary gland) to form a primary duct, then branches form from the initial primary ducts throughout the mammary tissue through terminal end bud bifurcation and lateral side branching. The mammary duct cells are composed of many layers (from internal to external), which are two layers of epithelial cells, a sheath of basement membrane, an outer ring of fibrous interstitial ECM, and lastly, a layer of loose connective tissue. During branch formation, considerable change is observed in the composition of the basement membrane and the interstitial ECM, indicating that the proteins in these layers play roles in cell outgrowth. For instance, α2 integrin negatively controls branching, as α2 integrin knockouts exhibit diminished branching.Citation148 Other adhesion complexes required include P-cadherin, which is expressed in the monolayer of epithelial cap cells at the end buds and is necessary for the maintenance of mammary tissue integrity.Citation149 Mammary branch morphogenesis also requires proper arrangement of the actin cytoskeleton for disruption of genes that regulate actin dynamics and polymerization, such as gelsolin and ROR-2 which prevent branch formation.Citation145,146 As these ducts are branching out they make contacts with surrounding adipose tissues.Citation147 Hormonal guidance cues are also necessary for inducing branch development in adolescence.Citation150 In order for branching morphogenesis to take place estrogen hormone (GH), estrogen receptor α (ERα), progesterone, and its receptor (PR) need to be present.Citation151,152 The neural guidance cue netrin-1 is also necessary for mammary branch formation, for it maintains connections between the preluminal cells to the cap cells in the terminal end buds of the mammary branches.Citation153,154 Therefore, the four cell outgrowth behaviors we have identified due to the presence of common genes between C. elegans outgrowth systems, are also behaviors used by outgrowth in other organisms.

Conclusions

We have discussed both the process and mechanisms used during outgrowth by nine non-neuronal cell types in C. elegans. We discussed the lineages from which these tissues emerge, and characterized in detail how these non-migratory tissues and cells grow outward as they change their shape during morphogenesis, and also described the genes and proteins that are necessary for mediating this outgrowth (Table S1). While we have shown that several gene families/types regulate outgrowth in multiple tissues, such as WAVE/SCAR proteins, integrins, and netrin signaling proteins, we must remember that expression levels of these genes will vary amongst each cell type and tissue. Equally, although we have shown that the behaviors regulated by C. elegans core components are hallmarks of cell behavior in other tissues, the importance of each gene's function can easily be impacted by the expression or inhibition of others, and therefore we must be cautious when determining the exact role each gene plays within each cell or tissue.

We hope that this work can be used as a resource not only for better understanding cell outgrowth, but also for presenting a broad set of models that can be used for studying cell outgrowth. In our previous work studying the mechanisms involved in utse development, we were able to glean more information about utse outgrowth by testing genes involved in outgrowth in other tissues. Cell outgrowth is a process that is present in a plethora of developing systems, and studying multiple cell outgrowth systems can shed light on the specific ways cells change their shape.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Supplemental material

KWRM_S_1405212.xlsx

Download MS Excel (43 KB)

Acknowledgments

We thank Mihoko Kato and reviewers for critical reading of the manuscript. P.W.S. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Funding

S.G. was supported by National Institutes of Health training grant GM07616. S. V. was supported by the American Society of Cell Biology Minorities Affairs Committee Visiting Professor's Program, which was funded by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute grant number 047101.

References

  • Yamaguchi TP, Bradley A, McMahon AP, Jones S. A Wnt5a pathway underlies outgrowth of multiple structures in the vertebrate embryo. Development. 1999;126:1211–23. PMID:10021340
  • Kujawski S, Lin W, Kitte F, Börmel M, Fuchs S, Arulmozhivarman G, Vogt S, Theil D, Zhang Y, Antos CL. Calcineurin regulates coordinated outgrowth of zebrafish regenerating fins. Dev Cell. 2014;28:573–87. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.019. PMID:24561038
  • Macabenta FD, Jensen AG, Cheng YS, Kramer JJ, Kramer SG. Frazzled/DCC facilitates cardiac cell outgrowth and attachment during Drosophila dorsal vessel formation. Dev Biol. 2013;380:233–42. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.05.007. PMID:23685255
  • Harrill JA, Freudenrich TM, Machacek DW, Stice SL, Mundy WR. Quantitative assessment of neurite outgrowth in human embryonic stem cell-derived nN2™ cells using automated high-content image analysis. NeuroToxicology. 2010;31:277–290 doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2010.02.003. PMID:20188755
  • Baranov VS, Ivaschenko TE, Liehr T, Yarmolinskaya MI. Systems genetics view of endometriosis: a common complex disorder. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185C:59–65. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.036.
  • Nguyen DX, Bos PD, Massagué J. Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:274–84. doi:10.1038/nrc2622. PMID:19308067
  • Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. PMID:4366476
  • Byerly L, Russell RL, Cassada RC. The life cycle of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. I. Wild-type growth and reproduction. Dev Biol. 1976;51:23–33. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(76)90119-6. PMID:988845
  • Sulston JE, Horvitz HR. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1977;56:110–56. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(77)90158-0. PMID:838129
  • Kimble J, Hirsh D. The postembryonic cell lineages of the hermaphrodite and male gonads in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1979;70:396–417. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(79)90035-6. PMID:478167
  • Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1983;100:64–119. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4. PMID:6684600
  • Hobert O. Specification of the nervous system, WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook. 2005; doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.12.1, http://www.wormbook.org.
  • Forrester WC, Garriga G. Genes necessary for C. elegans cell and growth cone migrations. Development. 1997;124:1831–43. PMID:9165130
  • Mehta N, Loria PM, Hobert O. A genetic screen for neurite outgrowth mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals a new function for the F-box ubiquitin ligase component LIN-23. Genetics. 2004;166:1253–67. doi:10.1534/genetics.166.3.1253. PMID:15082545
  • Wightman B, Clark SG, Taskar AM, Forrester WC, Maricq AV, Bargmann CI, Garriga G. The C. elegans gene vab-8 guides posteriorly directed axon outgrowth and cell migration. Development. 1996;122:671–82. PMID:8625818
  • Garriga G, Desai C, Horvitz HR. Cell interactions control the direction of outgrowth, branching and fasciculation of the HSN axons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 1993;117:1071–87. PMID:8325236
  • Stringham E, Pujol N, Vandekerckhove J, Bogaert T. unc-53 controls longitudinal migration in C. elegans. Development. 2002;129:3367–79. PMID:12091307
  • Ackley BD. Wnt-signaling and planar cell polarity genes regulate axon guidance along the anteroposterior axis in C. elegans. Dev Neurobiol. 2014;74:781–96. doi:10.1002/dneu.22146. PMID:24214205
  • Newman AP, White JG, Sternberg PW. Morphogenesis of the C. elegans hermaphrodite uterus. Development. 1996;122:3617–26. PMID:8951077
  • Hubbard EJ, Greenstein D. The Caenorhabditis elegans gonad: a test tube for cell and developmental biology. Dev Dyn. 2000;218:2–22. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(200005)218:1%3c2::AID-DVDY2%3e3.0.CO;2-W. PMID:10822256
  • Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR. Introduction to C. elegans. Chapter 1. C. elegans II. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997.
  • Greenwald IS, Sternberg PW, Horvitz HR. The lin-12 locus specifies cell fates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell. 1983;34:435–44. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90377-X. PMID:6616618
  • Lambie EJ, Kimble J. Two homologous regulatory genes, lin-12 and glp-1, have overlapping functions. Development. 1991;112:231–40. PMID:1769331
  • Newman AP, White JG, Sternberg PW. The Caenorhabditis elegans lin-12 gene mediates induction of ventral uterine specialization by the anchor cell. Development. 1995;121:263–271. PMID:7768171
  • Chang C, Newman AP, Sternberg PW. Reciprocal EGF signaling back to the uterus from the induced C. elegans vulva coordinates morphogenesis of epithelia. Curr. Biol. 1999;9:237–246 doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80112-2. PMID:10074449
  • Ghosh S, Sternberg PW. Spatial and molecular cues for cell outgrowth during C. elegans uterine development. Dev Biol. 2014;396:121–35. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.09.028. PMID:25281934
  • Sapir A, Choi J, Leikina E, Avinoam O, Valansi C, Chernomordik LV, Newman AP, Podbilewicz B. AFF-1, a FOS-1-regulated fusogen, mediates fusion of the anchor cell in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 2007;12:683–698. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.003. PMID:17488621
  • Sherwood DR, Sternberg PW. Anchor cell invasion into the vulval epithelium in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 2003;5:21–31. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00168-0. PMID:12852849
  • Seydoux G, Greenwald I. Cell autonomy of lin-12 function in a cell fate decision in C. elegans. Cell. 1989;57:1237–45. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90060-3. PMID:2736627
  • Gupta BP, Hanna-Rose W, Sternberg PW. Morphogenesis of the vulva and the vulval-uterine connection. WormBook. 2012:1–20. The C. elegans Research Community, PMID:23208727; doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.152.1, http://www.wormbook.org
  • Kimble J. Alterations in cell lineage following laser ablation of cells in the somatic gonad of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1981;87:286–300. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(81)90152-4. PMID:7286433
  • Hill RJ, Sternberg PW. The gene lin-3 encodes an inductive signal for vulval development in C. elegans. Nature. 1992;358:470–476. doi:10.1038/358470a0. PMID:1641037
  • Ferguson EL, Sternberg PW, Horvitz HR. A genetic pathway for the specification of the vulval cell lineages of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1987;326:259–67 doi:10.1038/326259a0. PMID:2881214
  • Sherwood DR, Butler JA, Kramer JM, Sternberg PW. FOS-1 promotes basement-membrane removal during anchor-cell invasion in C. elegans. Cell. 2005;121:951–62. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.031. PMID:15960981
  • Hwang BJ, Meruelo AD, Sternberg PW. C. elegans EVI1 proto-oncogene, EGL-43, is necessary for Notch-mediated cell fate specification and regulates cell invasion. Development. 2007;134:669–79. doi:10.1242/dev.02769. PMID:17215301
  • Wang Z, Chi Q, Sherwood DR. MIG-10 (lamellipodin) has netrin-independent functions and is a FOS-1A transcriptional target during anchor cell invasion in C. elegans. Development. 2014;141:1342–1353 doi:10.1242/dev.102434. PMID:24553288
  • Rimann I, Hajnal A. Regulation of anchor cell invasion and uterine cell fates by the egl-43 Evi-1 proto-oncogene in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 2007;308:187–95. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.05.023. PMID:17573066
  • Armenti ST, Lohmer LL, Sherwood DR, Nance J. Repurposing an endogenous degradation system for rapid and targeted depletion of C. elegans proteins. Development. 2014;141:4640–7. doi:10.1242/dev.115048. PMID:25377555
  • Matus DQ, Li XY, Durbin S, Agarwal D, Chi Q, Weiss SJ, Sherwood DR. In vivo identification of regulators of cell invasion across basement membranes. Sci Signal. 2010;3(120):ra35. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000654. PMID:20442418
  • Ziel JW, Hagedorn EJ, Audhya A, Sherwood DR. UNC-6 (netrin) orients the invasive membrane of the anchor cell in C. elegans. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:183–9. doi:10.1038/ncb1825. PMID:19098902
  • Morrissey MA, Hagedorn EJ, Sherwood DR. Cell invasion through basement membrane: The netrin receptor DCC guides the way. Worm. 2013;2:e26169. doi:10.4161/worm.26169. PMID:24778942
  • Wang Z, Linden LM, Naegeli KM, Ziel JW, Chi Q, Hagedorn EJ, Savage NS, Sherwood DR. UNC-6 (netrin) stabilizes oscillatory clustering of the UNC-40 (DCC) receptor to orient polarity. J Cell Biol. 2014;206:619–33. doi:10.1083/jcb.201405026. PMID:25154398
  • Ihara S, Hagedorn EJ, Morrissey MA, Chi Q, Motegi F, Kramer JM, Sherwood DR. Basement membrane sliding and targeted adhesion remodels tissue boundaries during uterine-vulval attachment in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:641–51. doi:10.1038/ncb2233. PMID:21572423
  • Hagedorn EJ, Yashiro H, Ziel JW, Ihara S, Wang Z, Sherwood DR. Integrin acts upstream of netrin signaling to regulate formation of the anchor cell's invasive membrane in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 2009;17:187–98. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.006. PMID:19686680
  • Schindler AJ, Sherwood DR. The transcription factor HLH-2/E/Daughterless regulates anchor cell invasion across basement membrane in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2011;357:380–91. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.07.012. PMID:21784067
  • Klerkx EP, Alarcón P, Waters K, Reinke V, Sternberg PW, Askjaer P. Protein kinase VRK-1 regulates cell invasion and EGL-17/FGF signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 2009;335:12–21. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.08.007. PMID:19679119
  • Morf MK, Rimann I, Alexander M, Roy P, Hajnal A. The Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of the Opitz syndrome gene, madd-2/Mid1, regulates anchor cell invasion during vulval development. Dev Biol. 2013;374:108–14. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.11.019. PMID:23201576
  • White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode C. elegans. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B. 1986;314:1–340. doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056.
  • Dixon SJ, Roy PJ. Muscle arm development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 2005;132:3079–92. doi:10.1242/dev.01883. PMID:15930100
  • Hall DH, Hedgecock EM. Kinesin-related gene unc-104 is required for axonal transport of synaptic vesicles in C. elegans. Cell. 1991;65:837–847. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90391-B. PMID:1710172
  • Hedgecock EM, Culotti JG, Hall DH. The unc-5, unc-6, and unc-40 genes guide circumferential migrations of pioneer axons and mesodermal cells on the epidermis in C. elegans. Neuron. 1990;4:61–85. doi:10.1016/0896-6273(90)90444-K.
  • Zhou HM, Brust-Mascher I, Scholey JM. Direct visualization of the movement of the monomeric axonal transport motor UNC-104 along neuronal processes in living Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2001;21:3749–3755. PMID:11356862
  • Alexander M, Chan KK, Byrne AB, Selman G, Lee T, Ono J, Wong E, Puckrin R, Dixon SJ, Roy PJ. An UNC-40 pathway directs postsynaptic membrane extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 2009;136:911–22. doi:10.1242/dev.030759. PMID:19211675
  • Bernstein BW, Bamburg JR. Tropomyosin binding to F-actin protects the F-actin from disassembly by brain actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF). Cell Motil. 1982;2:1–8. doi:10.1002/cm.970020102. PMID:6890875
  • Blanchoin L, Amann KJ, Higgs HN, Marchand JB, Kaiser DA, Pollard TD. Direct observation of dendritic actin filament networks nucleated by Arp2/3 complex and WASP/Scar proteins. Nature. 2000;404:1007–1011. doi:10.1038/35010008. PMID:10801131
  • DesMarais V, Ichetovkin I, Condeelis J, Hitchcock-DeGregori SE. Spatial regulation of actin dynamics: a tropomyosin-free, actin- rich compartment at the leading edge. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:4649–4660. doi:10.1242/jcs.00147. PMID:12415009
  • Ono S, Ono K. Tropomyosin inhibits ADF/cofilin-dependent actin filament dynamics. J Cell Biol. 2002;156:1065–1076. doi:10.1083/jcb.200110013. PMID:11901171
  • Seetharaman A, Selman G, Puckrin R, Barbier L, Wong E, D'Souza SA, Roy PJ. MADD-4 is a secreted cue required for midline-oriented guidance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell. 2011;21:669–80. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.020. PMID:22014523
  • Chan KK, Seetharaman A, Bagg R, Selman G, Zhang Y, Kim J, Roy PJ. EVA-1 functions as an UNC-40 Co-receptor to enhance attraction to the MADD-4 guidance cue in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004521. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004521. PMID:25122090
  • Alexander M, Selman G, Seetharaman A, Chan KK, D'Souza SA, Byrne AB, Roy PJ. MADD-2, a homolog of the Opitz syndrome protein MID1, regulates guidance to the midline through UNC-40 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell. 2010;18:961–72. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.05.016. PMID:20627078
  • Li P, Collins KM, Koelle MR, Shen K. LIN-12/Notch signaling instructs postsynaptic muscle arm development by regulating UNC-40/DCC and MADD-2 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Elife. 2013;2:e00378. doi:10.7554/eLife.00378. PMID:23539368
  • Dixon SJ, Alexander M, Fernandes R, Ricker N, Roy PJ. FGF negatively regulates muscle membrane extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 2006;133:1263–1275. doi:10.1242/dev.02300. PMID:16495308
  • Kokel M, Borland CZ, DeLong L, Horvitz HR, Stern MJ. clr-1 encodes a receptor tyrosine phosphatase that negatively regulates an FGF receptor signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1425–1437. doi:10.1101/gad.12.10.1425. PMID:9585503
  • Sulston JE, Albertson DG, Thomson JN. The Caenorhabditis elegans male: postembryonic development of nongonadal structures. Dev Biol. 1980;78:542–76. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(80)90352-8. PMID:7409314
  • Emmons SW. Male development, WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook. 2005; doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.33.1, http://www.wormbook.org
  • Emmons SW, Sternberg PW. Male Development and Mating Behavior. C. elegans II. 2nd edition. 1997. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Chapter 12. Ed. Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR.
  • Baird SE, Fitch DH, Kassem IA, Emmons SW. Pattern formation in the nematode epidermis: determination of the arrangement of peripheral sense organs in the C. elegans male tail. Development. 1991;113:515–26. PMID:1782863
  • Nguyen CQ, Hall DH, Yang Y, Fitch DH. Morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans male tail tip. Dev Biol. 1999;207:86–106. doi:10.1006/dbio.1998.9173. PMID:10049567
  • Chow KL, Hall DH, Emmons SW. The mab-21 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans encodes a novel protein required for choice of alternate cell fates. Development. 1995;121:3615–26. PMID:8582275
  • Chow KL, Emmons SW. HOM-C/Hox genes and four interacting loci determine the morphogenetic properties of single cells in the nematode male tail. Development. 1994;120:2579–92. PMID:7956833
  • Savage C, Das P, Finelli AL, Townsend SR, Sun CY, Baird SE, Padgett RW. Caenorhabditis elegans genes sma-2, sma-3, and sma-4 define a conserved family of transforming growth factor beta pathway components. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:790–4. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.2.790. PMID:8570636
  • Baird SE, Emmons SW. Properties of a class of genes required for ray morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1990;126:335–44. PMID:2245913
  • Hill KL, Harfe BD, Dobbins CA, L'Hernault SW. dpy-18 encodes an alpha-subunit of prolyl-4-hydroxylase in caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2000;155:1139–48. PMID:10880476
  • Ko FC, Chow KL. A novel thioredoxin-like protein encoded by the C. elegans dpy-11 gene is required for body and sensory organ morphogenesis. Development. 2002;129:1185–94. PMID:11874914
  • Winter AD, Page AP. Prolyl 4-hydroxylase is an essential procollagen-modifying enzyme required for exoskeleton formation and the maintenance of body shape in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:4084–93. doi:10.1128/MCB.20.11.4084-4093.2000. PMID:10805750
  • Yu RY, Nguyen CQ, Hall DH, Chow KL. Expression of ram-5 in the structural cell is required for sensory ray morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans male tail. EMBO J. 2000;19:3542–55. doi:10.1093/emboj/19.14.3542. PMID:10899109
  • Zhao X, Yang Y, Fitch DH, Herman MA. TLP-1 is an asymmetric cell fate determinant that responds to Wnt signals and controls male tail tip morphogenesis in C. elegans. Development. 2002;129:1497–508. PMID:11880358
  • Mason DA, Rabinowitz JS, Portman DS. dmd-3, a doublesex-related gene regulated by tra-1, governs sex-specific morphogenesis in C. elegans. Development. 2008;135:2373–82. doi:10.1242/dev.017046. PMID:18550714
  • Del Rio-Albrechtsen T, Kiontke K, Chiou SY, Fitch DH. Novel gain-of-function alleles demonstrate a role for the heterochronic gene lin-41 in C. elegans male tail tip morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2006;297:74–86. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.04.472. PMID:16806150
  • Chisholm A. Control of cell fate in the tail region of C. elegans by the gene egl-5. Development. 1991;111:921–32. PMID:1879361
  • Simms CL, Baillie DL. A strawberry notch homolog, let-765/nsh-1, positively regulates lin-3/egf expression to promote RAS-dependent vulval induction in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2010;341:472–85. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.03.004. PMID:20230814
  • Nelson MD, Zhou E, Kiontke K, Fradin H, Maldonado G, Martin D, Shah K, Fitch DH. A bow-tie genetic architecture for morphogenesis suggested by a genome-wide RNAi screen in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002010. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002010. PMID:21408209
  • Buechner M. Tubes and the single C. elegans excretory cell. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12:479–84. doi:10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02364-4. PMID:12441252
  • McShea MA, Schmidt KL, Dubuke ML, Baldiga CE, Sullender ME, Reis AL, Zhang S, O'Toole SM, Jeffers MC, Warden RM, et al. Abelson interactor-1 (ABI-1) interacts with MRL adaptor protein MIG-10 and is required in guided cell migrations and process outgrowth in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2013;373:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.09.017. PMID:23022657
  • Buechner M, Hedgecock EM. Worm Breeder's Gazette. 1992;12:97
  • Sawa H, Lobel L, Horvitz HR. The Caenorhabditis elegans gene lin-17, which is required for certain asymmetric cell divisions, encodes a putative seven-transmembrane protein similar to the Drosophila frizzled protein. Genes Dev. 1996;10:2189–97. doi:10.1101/gad.10.17.2189. PMID:8804313
  • Park EC, Horvitz HR. Mutations with dominant effects on the behavior and morphology of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1986;113:821–52. PMID:3744028
  • Baum PD, Garriga G. Neuronal migrations and axon fasciculation are disrupted in ina-1 integrin mutants. Neuron. 1997;19:51–62. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80347-5. PMID:9247263
  • Gettner SN, Kenyon C, Reichardt LF. Characterization of beta pat-3 heterodimers, a family of essential integrin receptors in C. elegans. J Cell Biol. 1995;129:1127–41. doi:10.1083/jcb.129.4.1127. PMID:7744961
  • Rogalski TM, Mullen GP, Bush JA, Gilchrist EJ, Moerman DG. UNC-52/perlecan isoform diversity and function in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001;29:171–6. doi:10.1042/bst0290171. PMID:11356148
  • Zhu X, Joh K, Hedgecock EM, Hori K. Identification of epi-1 locus as a laminin alpha chain gene in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and characterization of epi-1 mutant alleles. DNA Seq. 1999;10:207–17. doi:10.3109/10425179909033950. PMID:10727078
  • Hutter H, Vogel BE, Plenefisch JD, Norris CR, Proenca RB, Spieth J, Guo C, Mastwal S, Zhu X, Scheel J, et al. Conservation and novelty in the evolution of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix genes. Science. 2000;287:989–94. doi:10.1126/science.287.5455.989. PMID:10669422
  • Pettitt J, Wood WB, Plasterk RH. cdh-3, a gene encoding a member of the cadherin superfamily, functions in epithelial cell morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 1996;122:4149–57. PMID:9012534
  • Poinat P, De Arcangelis A, Sookhareea S, Zhu X, Hedgecock EM, Labouesse M, Georges-Labouesse E. A conserved interaction between beta1 integrin/PAT-3 and Nck-interacting kinase/MIG-15 that mediates commissural axon navigation in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2002;12:622–31. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00764-9. PMID:11967148
  • Marcus-Gueret N, Schmidt KL, Stringham EG. Distinct cell guidance pathways controlled by the Rac and Rho GEF domains of UNC-73/TRIO in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2012;190:129–42. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.134429. PMID:21996675
  • Steven R, Kubiseski TJ, Zheng H, Kulkarni S, Mancillas J, Ruiz Morales A, Hogue CW, Pawson T, Culotti J. UNC-73 activates the Rac GTPase and is required for cell and growth cone migrations in C. elegans. Cell. 1998;92:785–95. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81406-3. PMID:9529254
  • Manser J, Roonprapunt C, Margolis B. C. elegans cell migration gene mig-10 shares similarities with a family of SH2 domain proteins and acts cell nonautonomously in excretory canal development. Dev Biol. 1997;184:150–64 doi:10.1006/dbio.1997.8516. PMID:9142991
  • Patel N, Thierry-Mieg D, Mancillas JR. Cloning by insertional mutagenesis of a cDNA encoding Caenorhabditis elegans kinesin heavy chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:9181–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.19.9181. PMID:8105472
  • Schmidt KL, Marcus-Gueret N, Adeleye A, Webber J, Baillie D, Stringham EG. The cell migration molecule UNC-53/NAV2 is linked to the ARP2/3 complex by ABI-1. Development. 2009;136:563–74. doi:10.1242/dev.016816. PMID:19168673
  • Otsuka AJ, Jeyaprakash A, García-Añoveros J, Tang LZ, Fisk G, Hartshorne T, Franco R, Born T. The C. elegans unc-104 gene encodes a putative kinesin heavy chain-like protein. Neuron. 1991;6:113–22. doi:10.1016/0896-6273(91)90126-K. PMID:1846075
  • Merz DC, Zheng H, Killeen MT, Krizus A, Culotti JG. Multiple signaling mechanisms of the UNC-6/netrin receptors UNC-5 and UNC-40/DCC in vivo. Genetics. 2001;158:1071–80. PMID:11454756
  • Wang Q, Wadsworth WG. The C domain of netrin UNC-6 silences calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase- and diacylglycerol-dependent axon branching in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2002;22:2274–82. PMID:11896167
  • Altun ZF, Hall DH. Muscle system, head mesodermal cell. In WormAtlas. 2009; doi:10.3908/wormatlas.1.10
  • White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. The structure of the ventral nerve cord of Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond. 1976;275B:327–348. doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0086.
  • Yanowitz JL, Shakir MA, Hedgecock E, Hutter H, Fire AZ, Lundquist EA. UNC-39, the C. elegans homolog of the human myotonic dystrophy-associated homeodomain protein Six5, regulates cell motility and differentiation. Dev Biol. 2004;272:389–402. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.05.010. PMID:15282156
  • Chisholm AD, Hardin J. Epidermal morphogenesis, WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook. 2005; doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.35.1, http://www.wormbook.org
  • Gendreau SB, Moskowitz IP, Terns RM, Rothman JH. The potential to differentiate epidermis is unequally distributed in the AB lineage during early embryonic development in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 1994;166:770–81. doi:10.1006/dbio.1994.1355. PMID:7813794
  • Page BD, Zhang W, Steward K, Blumenthal T, Priess JR. ELT-1, a GATA-like transcription factor, is required for epidermal cell fates in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1651–61. doi:10.1101/gad.11.13.1651. PMID:9224715
  • Williams-Masson EM, Heid PJ, Lavin CA, Hardin J. The cellular mechanism of epithelial rearrangement during morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans dorsal hypodermis. Dev Biol. 1998;204:263–76. doi:10.1006/dbio.1998.9048. PMID:9851858
  • Priess JR, Hirsh DI. Caenorhabditis elegans morphogenesis: the role of the cytoskeleton in elongation of the embryo. Dev Biol. 1986;117:156–73. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(86)90358-1. PMID:3743895
  • Hardin J, Walston T. Models of morphogenesis: the mechanisms and mechanics of cell rearrangement. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004;14:399–406. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2004.06.008. PMID:15261656
  • Heid PJ, Raich WB, Smith R, Mohler WA, Simokat K, Gendreau SB, Rothman JH, Hardin J. The zinc finger protein DIE-1 is required for late events during epithelial cell rearrangement in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2001;236:165–80. doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0315. PMID:11456452
  • Pocock R, Ahringer J, Mitsch M, Maxwell S, Woollard A. A regulatory network of T-box genes and the even-skipped homologue vab-7 controls patterning and morphogenesis in C. elegans. Development. 2004;131:2373–85. doi:10.1242/dev.01110. PMID:15102704
  • Ghenea S, Boudreau JR, Lague NP, Chin-Sang ID. The VAB-1 Eph receptor tyrosine kinase and SAX-3/Robo neuronal receptors function together during C. elegans embryonic morphogenesis. Development. 2005;132:3679–90. doi:10.1242/dev.01947. PMID:16033794
  • Hoier EF, Mohler WA, Kim SK, Hajnal A. The Caenorhabditis elegans APC-related gene apr-1 is required for epithelial cell migration and Hox gene expression. Genes Dev. 2000;14:874–86. PMID:10766743
  • Soto MC, Qadota H, Kasuya K, Inoue M, Tsuboi D, Mello CC, Kaibuchi K. The GEX-2 and GEX-3 proteins are required for tissue morphogenesis and cell migrations in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2002;16:620–32. doi:10.1101/gad.955702. PMID:11877381
  • Patel FB, Bernadskaya YY, Chen E, Jobanputra A, Pooladi Z, Freeman KL, Gally C, Mohler WA, Soto MC. The WAVE/SCAR complex promotes polarized cell movements and actin enrichment in epithelia during C. elegans embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 2008;324:297–309. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.09.023. PMID:18938151
  • Giuliani C, Troglio F, Bai Z, Patel FB, Zucconi A, Malabarba MG, Disanza A, Stradal TB, Cassata G, Confalonieri S, et al. Requirements for F-BAR proteins TOCA-1 and TOCA-2 in actin dynamics and membrane trafficking during Caenorhabditis elegans oocyte growth and embryonic epidermal morphogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000675. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000675. PMID:19798448
  • Sawa M, Suetsugu S, Sugimoto A, Miki H, Yamamoto M, Takenawa T. Essential role of the C. elegans Arp2/3 complex in cell migration during ventral enclosure. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1505–18. doi:10.1242/jcs.00362. PMID:12640035
  • Walston T, Guo C, Proenca R, Wu M, Herman M, Hardin J, Hedgecock E. mig-5/Dsh controls cell fate determination and cell migration in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2006;298:485–97. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.06.053. PMID:16899238
  • Putzke AP, Hikita ST, Clegg DO, Rothman JH. Essential kinase-independent role of a Fer-like non-receptor tyrosine kinase in Caenorhabditis elegans morphogenesis. Development. 2005;132:3185–95. doi:10.1242/dev.01900. PMID:15958510
  • Kitagawa H, Izumikawa T, Mizuguchi S, Dejima K, Nomura KH, Egusa N, Taniguchi F, Tamura J, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, et al. Expression of rib-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of the human tumor suppressor EXT genes, is indispensable for heparan sulfate synthesis and embryonic morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:8533–44. doi:10.1074/jbc.M611107200. PMID:17237233
  • Mörck C, Vivekanand V, Jafari G, Pilon M. C. elegans ten-1 is synthetic lethal with mutations in cytoskeleton regulators, and enhances many axon guidance defective mutants. BMC Dev Biol. 2010;10:55. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-10-55. PMID:20497576
  • Williams-Masson EM, Malik AN, Hardin J. An actin-mediated two-step mechanism is required for ventral enclosure of the C. elegans hypodermis. Development. 1997124:2889–901. PMID:9247332
  • Withee J, Galligan B, Hawkins N, Garriga G. Caenorhabditis elegans WASP and Ena/VASP proteins play compensatory roles in morphogenesis and neuronal cell migration. Genetics. 2004;167:1165–76. doi:10.1534/genetics.103.025676. PMID:15280232
  • Thomas-Virnig CL, Sims PA, Simske JS, Hardin J. The inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor regulates epidermal cell migration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1882–7. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.10.001. PMID:15498499
  • Costa M, Raich W, Agbunag C, Leung B, Hardin J, Priess JR. A putative catenin-cadherin system mediates morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:297–308. doi:10.1083/jcb.141.1.297. PMID:9531567
  • Raich WB, Agbunag C, Hardin J. Rapid epithelial-sheet sealing in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo requires cadherin-dependent filopodial priming. Curr Biol. 1999;9:1139–46. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80015-9. PMID:10531027
  • Pásti G, Labouesse M. Epithelial junctions, cytoskeleton, and polarity. WormBook. 2014;4:1–35. doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.56.2.
  • George SE, Simokat K, Hardin J, Chisholm AD. The VAB-1 Eph receptor tyrosine kinase functions in neural and epithelial morphogenesis in C. elegans. Cell. 1998;92:633–43. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81131-9. PMID:9506518
  • Wang X, Roy PJ, Holland SJ, Zhang LW, Culotti JG, Pawson T. Multiple ephrins control cell organization in C. elegans using kinase-dependent and -independent functions of the VAB-1 Eph receptor. Mol Cell. 1999;4:903–13. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80220-8. PMID:10635316
  • Chin-Sang ID, George SE, Ding M, Moseley SL, Lynch AS, Chisholm AD. The ephrin VAB-2/EFN-1 functions in neuronal signaling to regulate epidermal morphogenesis in C. elegans. Cell. 1999;99:781–90. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81675-X. PMID:10619431
  • Ikegami R, Simokat K, Zheng H, Brown L, Garriga G, Hardin J, Culotti J. Semaphorin and Eph receptor signaling guide a series of cell movements for ventral enclosure in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.009. PMID:22197242
  • Roy PJ, Zheng H, Warren CE, Culotti JG. mab-20 encodes Semaphorin-2a and is required to prevent ectopic cell contacts during epidermal morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 2000;127:755–67. PMID:10648234
  • Chin-Sang ID, Chisholm AD. Form of the worm: genetics of epidermal morphogenesis in C. elegans. Trends Genet. 2000;16:544–51. doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02143-0. PMID:11102704
  • Nakao F, Hudson ML, Suzuki M, Peckler Z, Kurokawa R, Liu Z, Gengyo-Ando K, Nukazuka A, Fujii T, Suto, F, et al. The PLEXIN PLX-2 and the ephrin EFN-4 have distinct roles in MAB-20/Semaphorin 2A signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans morphogenesis. Genetics. 2007;176:1591–607. doi:10.1534/genetics.106.067116. PMID:17507686
  • Topf U, Chiquet-Ehrismann R. Genetic interaction between Caenorhabditis elegans teneurin ten-1 and prolyl 4-hydroxylase phy-1 and their function in collagen IV-mediated basement membrane integrity during late elongation of the embryo. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:3331–43. doi:10.1091/mbc.E10-10-0853. PMID:21795395
  • King RS, Maiden SL, Hawkins NC, Kidd AR, 3rd, Kimble J, Hardin J, Walston TD. The N- or C-terminal domains of DSH-2 can activate the C. elegans Wnt/beta-catenin asymmetry pathway. Dev Biol. 2009;328:234–44. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.01.017. PMID:19298786
  • Kitagawa H, Izumikawa T, Mizuguchi S, Dejima K, Nomura KH, Egusa N, Taniguchi F, Tamura J, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, et al. Expression of rib-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of the human tumor suppressor EXT genes, is indispensable for heparan sulfate synthesis and embryonic morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:8533–44. doi:10.1074/jbc.M611107200. PMID:17237233
  • Hudson ML, Kinnunen T, Cinar HN, Chisholm AD. C. elegans Kallmann syndrome protein KAL-1 interacts with syndecan and glypican to regulate neuronal cell migrations. Dev Biol. 2006;294:352–65. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.036. PMID:16677626
  • Sawa M, Takenawa T. Caenorhabditis elegans WASP-interacting protein homologue WIP-1 is involved in morphogenesis through maintenance of WSP-1 protein levels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;340:709–17. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.056. PMID:16378591
  • Kubota Y, Tsuyama K, Takabayashi Y, Haruta N, Maruyama R, Iida N, Sugimoto A. The PAF1 complex is involved in embryonic epidermal morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 2014;391:43–53. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.04.002. PMID:24721716
  • Fotopoulos N, Wernike D, Chen Y, Makil N, Marte A, Piekny A. Caenorhabditis elegans anillin (ani-1) regulates neuroblast cytokinesis and epidermal morphogenesis during embryonic development. Dev Biol. 2012;383:61 doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.08.024.
  • Antoshechkin I, Han M. The C. elegans evl-20 gene is a homolog of the small GTPase ARL2 and regulates cytoskeleton dynamics during cytokinesis and morphogenesis. Dev Cell. 2002;2:579–91. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00146-6. PMID:12015966
  • Crowley MR, Head KL, Kwiatkowski DJ, Asch HL, Asch BB. The mouse mammary gland requires the actin-binding protein gelsolin for proper ductal morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2000;225:407–23. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9844. PMID:10985859
  • Roarty K, Shore AN, Creighton CJ, Rosen JM. Ror2 regulates branching, differentiation, and actin-cytoskeletal dynamics within the mammary epithelium. J Cell Biol. 2015;208:351–66. doi:10.1083/jcb.201408058. PMID:25624393
  • Fata JE, Werb Z, Bissell MJ. Regulation of mammary gland branching morphogenesis by the extracellular matrix and its remodeling enzymes. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6:1–11. doi:10.1186/bcr634. PMID:14680479
  • Chen J, Diacovo TG, Grenache DG, Santoro SA, Zutter MM: The alpha(2) integrin subunit-deficient mouse: a multifaceted phenotype including defects of branching morphogenesis and hemostasis. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:337–344. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64185-5. PMID:12107118
  • Albergaria A, Ribeiro AS, Vieira AF, Sousa B, Nobre AR, Seruca R, Schmitt F, Paredes J. P-cadherin role in normal breast development and cancer. Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55:811–22. doi:10.1387/ijdb.113382aa. PMID:22161837
  • Sternlicht MD, Kouros-Mehr H, Lu P, Werb Z. Hormonal and local control of mammary branching morphogenesis. Differentiation. 2006;74:365–81. doi:10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00105.x. PMID:16916375
  • Bocchinfuso WP, Lindzey JK, Hewitt SC, Clark JA, Myers PH, Cooper R, Korach KS. Induction of mammary gland development in estrogen receptor-alpha knockout mice. Endocrinology. 2000;141:2982–2994. doi:10.1210/endo.141.8.7609. PMID:10919287
  • Curtis Hewitt S, Couse JF, Korach KS. Estrogen receptor transcription and transactivation: Estrogen receptor knockout mice: what their phenotypes reveal about mechanisms of estrogen action. Breast Cancer Res. 2000;2:345–352. doi:10.1186/bcr79. PMID:11250727
  • Manivannan S, Nelson CM. Dynamics of branched tissue assembly. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;3:42. doi:10.1186/scrt133. PMID:23114096
  • Srinivasan K, Strickland P, Valdes A, Shin G, Hinck L: Netrin-1/neogenin interaction stabilizes multipotent progenitor cap cells during mammary gland morphogenesis. Dev Cell 2003;3(4):371–382. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00054-6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.